1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsQBI 2026 announcement deadline Nov. 14, 2026 (other topics have Oct/Sept 2026 deadlines)
Quantum Computing (Quantum-Relevant) is sponsored by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). This DARPA funding call focuses on developing quantum computing architectures capable of utility-scale operation, where the computational value exceeds the cost.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
DARPA Advances Quantum Computing Initiative DARPA Advances Quantum Computing Initiative Quantum Business , Research DARPA has advanced 11 companies to Stage B of its Quantum Benchmarking Initiative, moving the program from conceptual proposals to technical validation of utility-scale quantum computing architectures.
Stage B will evaluate each company’s R&D plans, risk-mitigation strategies, and prototype roadmaps to determine whether their approaches are realistic and scalable. The initiative aims to assess whether an industrially useful quantum computer—one whose computational value exceeds its cost—can be developed by 2033. What Does Stage B Mean for DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative?
The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has moved its flagship quantum computing effort, the Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (QBI), into its next phase — or Stage B — a shift from conceptual review toward rigorous technical validation of utility-scale quantum architectures. A total of 11 companies have moved into Stage B, according to the DARPA project web page .
Under the initiative’s three-stage scheme, participants must first present a plausible architecture (Stage A), then a detailed R&D plan (Stage B), and finally undergo independent verification of hardware (Stage C).
The transition to Stage B follows the completion of Stage A evaluations, in which DARPA assessed how well companies defined a path to achieving “utility-scale” quantum computing — meaning computational value that exceeds cost. DARPA Now, DARPA will subject select firms to a year-long deep dive into the realism of their roadmaps, risk-mitigation strategies and prototype burn-down plans.
Which Companies Are Advancing to Stage B and What Qubit Technologies Do They Use?
DARPA reports the following companies (with their qubit technology approach) have been selected for Stage B at this time: Company Location Qubit Approach Atom Computing Boulder Colorado Neutral atom arrays Diraq Sydney and US locations Silicon CMOS spin qubits IBM Yorktown Heights New York Modular superconducting processors IonQ College Park Maryland Trapped ions Nord Quantique Sherbrooke Canada Superconducting qubits with bosonic correction Photonic Inc. Vancouver Canada Optically linked silicon spin qubits Quantinuum Broomfield Colorado Trapped ion QCCD architecture Quantum Motion London UK MOS silicon spin qubits QuEra Computing Boston Massachusetts Neutral atom arrays Silicon Quantum Computing Sydney Australia Precision atom qubits in silicon Xanadu Toronto Canada Photonic quantum computing The list may grow, according to DARPA, adding that It is likely but not guaranteed that additional teams will enter Stage B in the future.
DARPA plans to announce any additional promotion decisions once they contracted with those teams. In summary, Stage B includes the most diverse cross section of qubit technologies DARPA has ever evaluated in a single program. Can a Useful Quantum Computer Be Developed by 2033?
By selecting multiple firms for Stage B, DARPA signals that it believes certain concepts presented in Stage A met the threshold of plausibility. The initiative’s ultimate goal is to assess whether an industrially-useful quantum computer can be developed by 2033 — defined as a system whose computational value outweighs its cost.
The move from conceptual review to rigorous validation suggests DARPA is narrowing focus from “could this work” to “can this be built. ” The DARPA team writes: “The Quantum Benchmarking Initiative is an expansion of the existing DARPA Underexplored Systems for Utility-Scale Quantum Computing (US2QC). QBI is separate from but related to the existing Quantum Benchmarking (QB) program that seeks to determine the yardstick for impact.
In the simplest terms, QB seeks to answer the question: If a fully functioning quantum computer magically appeared, what would it make possible that a standard computer cannot accomplish? ” For the quantum-computing ecosystem, this transition marks a maturation step. Firms that advance to Stage B are now tasked with detailing how they will scale, mitigate risks, and integrate prototypes — not just propose bold architectures.
The outcome will provide clearer signals to investors, partners and national-security stakeholders about which qubit modalities and architectures may succeed. What Will DARPA Evaluate During Stage B and How Will Firms Advance? During Stage B (estimated to last about one year), DARPA will assess each performer’s R&D plan, prototype roadmap, risk-mitigation strategy and manufacturing pathway.
After satisfactory review, select firms will proceed to Stage C, where independent verification and validation teams will test actual hardware against benchmarks. DARPA says it is ultimately “interested in pursuing all viable approaches for which there is available funding. ” That means QBI is not a competition to narrow the field to an ultimate winner, or even a few “winners.
” “Rather, the aim is to evaluate each company’s approach on its own merits,” the team writes. “Multiple, single, or even no participants will ultimately demonstrate a path to an industrially useful quantum computer within the next eight years. Thorough evaluation is crucial to understanding the true potential of the technology.
Frequently Asked Questions What is DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative (QBI)? The Quantum Benchmarking Initiative is DARPA’s flagship quantum computing effort designed to assess whether an industrially useful quantum computer—one whose computational value exceeds its cost—can be developed by 2033. What does Stage B involve?
Stage B represents a shift from conceptual review toward rigorous technical validation. DARPA will conduct a year-long deep dive into the realism of each company’s roadmaps, risk-mitigation strategies, and prototype burn-down plans. Which companies advanced to Stage B?
Eleven companies advanced: Atom Computing (neutral atoms), Diraq (silicon spin qubits), IBM (superconducting processors), IonQ (trapped-ion), Nord Quantique (superconducting with bosonic error correction), Photonic Inc. (silicon spin qubits), Quantinuum (trapped-ion), Quantum Motion (silicon spin qubits), QuEra Computing (neutral atom), Silicon Quantum Computing (atom qubits in silicon), and Xanadu (photonic).
What is the three-stage structure? Participants must present a plausible architecture (Stage A), then a detailed R&D plan (Stage B), and finally undergo independent verification of hardware (Stage C). What is “utility-scale” quantum computing?
Utility-scale quantum computing means computational value that exceeds cost—a quantum computer that provides more value than it costs to build and operate. What happens after Stage B? After satisfactory review in Stage B, select firms will proceed to Stage C, where independent verification and validation teams will test actual hardware against benchmarks.
Is this a competition to find a single winner? No. DARPA is evaluating each company’s approach on its own merits. Multiple, single, or even no participants may ultimately demonstrate a path to an industrially useful quantum computer within eight years.
What does this advancement signal? The transition marks a maturation step for quantum computing, moving from “could this work” to “can this be built. ” Firms must now detail how they will scale, mitigate risks, and integrate prototypes.
With a several-decades long background in journalism and communications, Matt Swayne has worked as a science communicator for an R1 university for more than 12 years, specializing in translating high tech and deep tech for the general audience. He has served as a writer, editor and analyst at The Quantum Insider since its inception.
In addition to his service as a science communicator, Matt also develops courses to improve the media and communications skills of scientists and has taught courses. matt@thequantuminsider. com The Weekly Quantum Digest: Anyone Fancy A Slice of Quantum Pi?
Nemesis Technologies Plans Investment in Quantum, Other DeepTech Areas 10 Enterprises Experimenting with Quantum Technology in 2023 Startup Launches With Plan to Shield Blockchains From Quantum Threat Why Are Logical Qubits Important? What is Quantum Machine Learning (QML)?
12 Top Quantum Computing Universities in 2025 Sifting through the Clouds: Polish Researchers Will Test the Utility of Quantum Algorithms for Satellite Imagery Keep track of everything going on in the Quantum Technology Market.
JIJ And ORCA Computing Report on Path to Commercial Quantum Advantage in Energy Optimization Silicon Quantum Computing Secures Additional AUD$40 Million From Australia’s NRFC enQase to Showcase Quantum Security Leadership at Quantum.
Tech World 2026 Guest Post — The Decade-Defining Race to Lock Down the World’s Data Before Quantum Breaks It Quantum Companies Join World Economic Forum’s Technology Pioneers The Companies Building Quantum Computing Chips in 2026 QTREX Awarded Government Grant to Advance Native RF Dielectric Material for Quantum Computing QuantX Labs Announces Seed Round With Serendipity Capital Lead Investor [ivory-search id=”2367594″ title=”Custom Search Form”] One of our team will be in touch to learn more about your requirements, and provide pricing and access options.
Required for core functionality (cannot be disabled). Helps us measure traffic and improve the site. Used to personalize content/ads across platforms.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: All responsible sources capable of satisfying the Government's needs may submit a proposal. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows not specified (part of DARPA's FY2026 budget with a $4.9 billion allocation for advanced research). Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Applications for Quantum Computing (Quantum-Relevant) are due November 14, 2026. Build your timeline backwards from this date to cover registrations, approvals, and final submission checks.
Quantum Computing (Quantum-Relevant) is funded by Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Yes — this listing is flagged as national in scope, so applicants across the U.S. may apply, subject to the sponsor's other eligibility criteria.
Applications go through the funder's official portal — the Apply Now link on this page goes there directly.
DPA26BZ06-DV023 is a Direct-to-Phase-II SBIR paying $700,000 over 18 months plus a $500,000 option. The physics demands 256x more transmit power than the systems that qualify you to compete, and DARPA will not accept modeling alone as proof. Here is the eligibility wall, the five engineering problems, and who can realistically win it before the October 21 close.
Read articleRelease 6's SBIR topics got the attention. Its three STTR topics — SHIELDER, fuel-flexible electric propulsion, and hypersonic wind tunnel noise diagnostics — are all Direct-to-Phase-II, all require a research institution to perform at least 30 percent of the work, and all close October 21, 2026. The feasibility gates are the real filter.
Read articleDPA26BZ06-DV026 offers $300,000 at Phase I or $1,800,000 as a single Direct-to-Phase-II tranche with no options. The deliverable is a simulated auction market that measures whether AI agents deceive, collude, or manipulate the humans they serve — measured entirely from the outside. Here is the 90% efficiency gate, the team composition most bidders will get wrong, and why this topic sits in DARPA's biology office.
Read article