1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsReproductive Justice Grant is sponsored by Not specified, but focuses on specific US states.. This grant cycle supports grassroots, community organizing efforts that advance the movement for reproductive justice in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and/or Wyoming.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the funder's official program page to help you evaluate fit faster.
Application Guidelines – The Lalor Foundation Due to the increase in restrictions for women living in places where the right to choose has been or threatens to be abolished, we are focusing our efforts on supporting organizations that value reproductive rights and help women gain access to contraception and abortions.
The Anna Lalor Burdick Program funds initiatives that bring women information and access to reproductive health care, contraception, and pregnancy termination in order to help broaden and enhance their options in life. Applicants must be tax exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service Code and defined as “not a private foundation” under section 509(a) of the Code.
While projects may take place outside the U.S., only organizations based in the United States are eligible. The Anna Lalor Burdick (ALB) Program supports programs that offer sexual and reproductive health education to women.
It is interested in programs serving women who are disadvantaged by poverty, discrimination, geographic isolation, lack of comprehensive sex education, hostile public policy, or other factors leading to inadequate sexual and reproductive health. The ALB Program is particularly interested in supporting new programs or initiatives, or innovations in successful programs .
Programs at new or small organizations, including those with a grassroots base, that are capable of delivering excellent services will also be considered. The ALB Program typically does not support general operations , ongoing programs, or existing staff positions.
have a comprehensive approach to SRH education that includes unbiased information on all options include novel ideas or innovative methods of delivering information define clear goals and intended outcomes as well as a feasible plan to assess impact and success be exemplars for replication if successful be economically sustainable if successful Programs that incorporate advocacy or policy change, consistent with IRS 501(c)(3) status, are of particular interest.
Programs that focus exclusively on the following are generally not considered : HIV/HPV/sexually transmitted disease prevention one-time direct supply costs (e.g. distribution of menstrual products, LARCs, or contraception) menstrual health or hygiene maternal health, infant health, or postpartum issues advocacy on behalf of teen parents However, programs that incorporate these issues as part of a comprehensive strategy for enhancing women’s reproductive freedom and options will be reviewed, on a case-by-case basis.
to individuals, or for individual research projects and scholarships for endowment or major capital support to crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) for abstinence-only programs, or programs that fail to offer unbiased information on all options Funding Availability and Duration The ALB Program awards a small number of grants in the range of $10,000 to $35,000, with an average grant size between $15,000 and $25,000.
Grants are awarded for one year. On rare occasions, trustees invite follow-up work to a project that has shown outstanding results or promise during its first year. The first step in applying for a grant is to submit a concept paper.
Instructions for preparing an online concept application can be found on the Application Instructions page of this website. Concept papers must be submitted online. The online portal will open one month prior to each concept paper deadline.
Applicants will be informed within 6-8 weeks of the deadline date of the trustees’ decision regarding the concept paper. A small number of applicants will be invited to submit a full proposal. Those invited will receive a full set of instructions to assist in the preparation of the proposal.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Grassroots, community organizing efforts in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Washington, and/or Wyoming. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Reproductive Justice Grant is funded by Not specified, but focuses on specific US states.. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Washington, Montana, Wyoming, Oregon, and Idaho. Check the official notice for exact location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
NIH is carrying its emergency peer review modifications into the January 2027 Advisory Council with more than 35,000 applications in the queue. Discussion drops to 30-35 percent, the middle third becomes "competitive but not discussed" and stays eligible for funding, and the resume of discussion disappears from your summary statement. Here is what each change does to a real application.
Read articleThe Gates Foundation and Wellcome Leap each committed $50 million over three years to halve stillbirth rates, announced October 12, 2026 in Berlin. The money flows through Wellcome Leap's milestone-gated MARFA and CORFA contracts, not grant agreements, and the paperwork is the real deadline.
Read articleUSDA-NIFA-HEP-011737 puts $14 million behind roughly 28 awards of up to $705,000 for graduate fellowships in food and agricultural sciences. No match is required. But two eligibility rules — the new-graduate-student definition and the citizenship requirement — disqualify most of the students a department would naturally nominate.
Read article