1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsThis program aims to eliminate untrusted telecommunications equipment from U. S. networks, reimbursing providers for the removal, replacement, and disposal of equipment from Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Providers of advanced communications services with ten million or fewer customers, for equipment obtained on or before June 30, 2020. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows $4.98 billion total program (additional $3.08 billion funding increase in FY 2025). Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
The published deadline was September 15, 2026, which has passed. Check the official notice for any future application windows before investing time in a proposal.
Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Reimbursement Program is funded by Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
Understanding the forms of local democracy in low-income and low-middle income countries is sponsored by European Commission — Horizon Europe. Expected Outcome: Projects should contribute to all of the following expected outcomes: EU institutions and national decision-makers are equipped with science-based tools, toolkits, training models, monitoring frameworks, and recommendations to proactively promote inequality reduction, human rights and democracy, in order to lead to more resilient and inclusive democratic societies in low-income and low-middle income countries [1] EU institutions and national decision-makers are better able to proactively promote democratic values, principles and practices in low- and low-middle income countries grounded in a better understanding of the actors at local level including their capacity and needs when engaging in democratic practices. EU institutions, national decision-makers, and civil society organisations can access and use (evidence-based) good practices for working in fragile contexts [2] EU institutions and national decision-makers understand the role of decentralization processes in low-income and low-middle income countries, and its impact on the quality of public services and on acceptance of democratic processes among citizens. In addition, projects should contribute to at least one of the following expected outcomes: Policymakers, public authorities, and service delivery providers have a better understanding of the link between efficient delivery of public services and pro-democratic sentiment in low-income and low-middle income countries. Civil society organisations, and other relevant actors, working in the fields of development cooperation and promotion of human rights have better tools to promote democratic practices at local level in low-income and low-middle income countries. Scope: Democratic backsliding and human rights rollbacks are increasing globally, especially in low- and middle-income countries, driven by internal instability and external interference promoting non-democratic models. These trends also represent a risk to the security of European citizens and businesses, and a destabilisation factor in the countries and regions with which the EU maintains diplomatic and economic relations. To tackle this, the EU has developed and started to implement several strategies to promote and defend democracy and human rights in third countries [3] . Developing countries with strong local democratic practices, such as elections and representative democracy at levels below the national government, tend to be more resilient against democratic backsliding. Proposals should therefore gather evidence on how actors in economic, political, and social ecosystems at the local level could foster democratic practices, increase citizens' trust in governance and democratic institutions, improve transparency of decision making, and promote respect for human rights. Proposals are also encouraged to gather evidence on different forms of democratic participation and governance at local level, paying particular attention to the inclusion of women and marginalised and underrepresented groups. In countries where central governments face significant territorial challenges and lack effective control over certain areas, the EU and Member States are left to cooperate with administrations at sub-national levels. In these cases, the objectives of the research projects may be achieved through the consultation and engagement of local administrations and civil society partners. Proposals are encouraged to investigate how EU and national public authorities can operate in these fragile contexts, where central governments do not have sound control of areas of the country. In addition, proposals are encouraged to investigate the link between efficient public service delivery and pro-democratic sentiment, experiences, and outcomes (measured, for example, by civic participation or trust in institutions), deliver a critical analysis of the evidence collected and identify good practices, conditions and methods for their transferability to other context Programme areas: Horizon Europe (HORIZON), Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness, Culture, creativity and inclusive society, Democracy and Governance Keywords: Developing countries, New participatory democracy models, Political systems and institutions, governance, Social structure, inequalities, social mobility, interethnic relations, Transformation of societies, democratization, social movements, ACP, ACP countries, Africa, Central Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, South Asia, Southeast Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, capacity building, civic participation, community engagement, decentralisation, democracy, democratisation, developing countries, electoral processes, forms of governance, governance, governance structures, grassroots movements, inclusive governance, institutional development, local democracy, local government, low-income countries, middle-income countries, political participation, public administration, socio-economic development
SaTC 2.0 is NSF's flagship cybersecurity, privacy, and trust research program reorganized to address emerging threats including generative AI security, open-source software security, quantum computing security, and supply chain security. Funded scope covers the bidirectional role of AI as both a cybersecurity threat (adversarial attacks on AI systems, AI-enabled cyberattacks, data poisoning) and a defensive tool (AI for intrusion detection, automated vulnerability discovery, secure-by-design AI). The program supports interdisciplinary collaboration across computer science, mathematics, social and behavioral sciences, and STEM education to build trust in global cyber ecosystems.
NSF SaTC 2.0 (Security Privacy and Trust in Cyberspace) is the largest open solicitation for university-led cybersecurity research in the federal portfolio now expanded with AI security as an explicit priority area. The 2.0 reboot added generative AI security open-source software security quantum computing security and supply chain security as topics of interest addressing the bidirectional role of AI as both a cybersecurity threat and a defensive tool. Research awards support adversarial machine learning and attacks on AI systems AI weaponization against people information and systems privacy-preserving machine learning and responsible AI use for detecting and responding to cyber threats. The program funds three award types: Research awards up to $1.2M for four years Education awards up to $500K for three years and Seedling awards up to $300K for two years through Dear Colleague Letters. Proposals are accepted on a recurring annual basis with two windows per year. This is distinct from NSF CyberAICorps which focuses on scholarship and workforce development and from NSF AIMing which focuses on AI formal methods and mathematical reasoning.
The Rural Health Care Program's Third Further Notice hit the Federal Register on August 31, 2026. It proposes killing cost studies, publishing an eligible services list, setting application processing deadlines, and eliminating the Healthcare Connect Fund annual report. What it conspicuously does not propose is any change to the $744.2 million cap that the whole proceeding says is under strain.
Read articleWC Docket No. 26-173 is the first comprehensive review of USAC since 1998. It proposes writing schools, libraries, and health care providers into the audit rule, codifying extrapolated recoveries from statistical samples, requiring payment before appeals resolve, and cutting the USAC board from 20 to 13 — eliminating the Schools and Libraries Committee along the way.
Read articleThe FY2026 COPS Technology and Equipment Program makes $401.4 million available for law enforcement technology, equipment, and interoperable communications — with no local match and a July 16 deadline. But it is a noncompetitive, invitational program: only entities named in the Congressional earmark schedule can apply. Here is how TEP actually works, why it dwarfs the competitive COPS programs, and what agencies not on the list should do instead.
Read article