Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program Grant (R43/R44)

Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Program Grant (R43/R44) is sponsored by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). The SBIR program supports small businesses in developing innovative and commercially viable products or technologies in areas aligned with the NIDCD's mission, including hearing, balance, taste, smell, voice, speech, and language.

Expired RFA-DC-12-001: Improving Access to Hearing Health Care (SBIR) [R43/R44] This notice has expired. Check the NIH Guide for active opportunities and notices. Part 1.

Overview Information Participating Organization(s) National Institutes of Health ( NIH ) Components of Participating National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Funding Opportunity Title Improving Access to Hearing Health Care (SBIR) [R43/R44] R43 / R44 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) Grant - Phase I, Phase II, and October 26, 2011 - This RFA has been expired and reissued as RFA-DC-12-004.

Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Number RFA-DC-12-002 , R41/R42 Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Grant - Phase I, Phase Additional Information on Eligibility .

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s) This Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) solicits Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant applications from small business concerns (SBCs) that propose the development and translation of technologies to improve hearing healthcare outcomes.

Responsive applications must seek to increase utilization of hearing health care technology by underserved patients and thus reduce health disparities. Open Date (Earliest Submission Date) Letter of Intent Due Date February 18, 2011; October 18, 2011; and June 18, 2012 March 18, 2011; November 18, 2011; and July 18, 2012, by 5:00 PM local time of applicant organization.

AIDS Application Due Date(s) June/July, 2011; February/March,2012; and October 2011; May, 2012; and January, 2013 December, 2011; July, 2012; and April, 2013 (Now Expired October 27, 2011 per issuance of RFA-DC-12-004 ), Original Date July 19, 2012 Required Application Instructions It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide except where instructed to do otherwise (in this FOA or in a Notice from the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts ).

Conformance to all requirements (both in the Application Guide and the FOA) is required and strictly enforced. Applicants must read and follow all application instructions in the Application Guide as well as any program-specific instructions noted in Section IV . When the program-specific instructions deviate from those in the Application Guide, follow the program-specific instructions.

Applications that do not comply with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review. Part 1. Overview Information Part 2.

Full Text of the Announcement Section I. Funding Opportunity Description Section II. Award Information Section III.

Eligibility Information Section IV. Application and Submission Section V. Application Review Information Section VI.

Award Administration Information Section VII. Agency Contacts Section VIII. Other Information I.

Funding Opportunity Description purpose of this funding opportunity (FOA) is to improve hearing health care outcomes and reduce health disparities through the development and commercialization of improved devices for hearing health care (HHC).

For the purposes of this FOA, hearing health care is defined as assessment and access to hearing aids and nonmedical treatment, including hearing screening and hearing assessment as well as acquiring an appropriate device and services for the individual’s hearing loss and communication needs.

Appropriate technologies must have the following basic characteristics: easily affordable, effective, culturally acceptable, and accessible to those who need them. This announcement calls for applications to develop devices and other technologies that address the HHC needs of the nation, including health disparity populations.

Generally, health disparity populations include racial and ethnic minorities, the rural and urban poor, and other medically Medical and scientific advances have introduced new opportunities for the continued improvement of health for all Americans.

However, in spite of notable technological advancement, there continues to be an underutilization of HHC and a disproportionate burden of illness among minority and other health disparity populations. Hearing loss (HL) is among the leading public health concerns. Approximately 17% of American adults, or 36 million people, report some degree of HL.

It is the third most prevalent chronic health condition facing seniors. Yet, fewer than 20% of those who require intervention and treatment seek help for their condition. Most hearing aid users have lived with HL for over 10 years and their impairments have progressed to moderate-to-severe levels before seeking a hearing aid.

For many reasons, the current HHC needs of the vast majority of adults with HL are not being met. In addition, overcoming persistent disparities in healthcare access and health outcomes remains a foremost challenge.

To meet this challenge, the NIH is committed to supporting a wide range of research, aimed at the development of innovative diagnostics, treatments, and preventative strategies to reduce, and eventually eliminate, health disparities. NIDCD sponsored a research working group on Accessible and Affordable Hearing Health Care for Adults with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss on August 25 -27, 2009.

The purpose of the working group was to develop a research agenda to increase accessibility and affordability of HHC for adults with mild to moderate HL, including accessible and low cost hearing aids. Small businesses are well suited to address many of the articulated research needs, and the SBIR (R43/R44) and STTR (R41/R42) grant programs represent a unique opportunity to provide assistance to these groups.

This FOA is one of several NIDCD research initiatives created in response to the working group recommendations. A summary of the working group report with the accompanying recommendations can be found at: http://www. nidcd.

nih. gov/funding/programs/09HHC/summary. htm Research Objectives and Scope The primary objective of this funding opportunity is to support the translation of technologies, new or existing, that can have a significant impact on healthcare access and health outcomes for individuals with hearing loss, including health disparity populations.

A requisite component of the research plan is a description of the healthcare requirements and needs of the population and the existing barriers to adequate healthcare delivery. Several of these barriers have been identified and are described below.

Applications submitted to this funding opportunity must have potential to improve HHC by developing and translating technologies that address one or more of these Physical Barriers factors such as proximity to healthcare facilities and transportation may limit access to healthcare.

Infrastructure Barriers rural hospitals and community health centers may not have the same resources and expertise of large hospitals, and may not be able to afford advanced but costly medical Economic Barriers lack of insurance coverage or financial resources may contribute to disparities in healthcare access and Knowledge Barriers health literacy and language barriers can inhibit healthcare delivery, including the patient’s knowledge of Cultural Barriers religious beliefs and social customs often deter certain populations from seeking healthcare.

User Barriers manual dexterity, cognitive Appropriate technologies must be effective, affordable, culturally acceptable, and deliverable in ways that are likely to provide significant gains in access for a specific health disparity population. It must provide an improvement over the current quality of care and overcome one or more of the barriers listed above.

The technology must also be low-cost, so as to be affordable to the local hospital, community health center, primary care physician, or individual patient in need. For a medical technology to be accepted and adopted, the technology development must be amenable to the population’s social customs and cultural beliefs.

To be physically deliverable to those in need, a technology must be developed within the specifications of the operating environment of the end-user. An overarching list of the types of technology that might achieve the objectives of this initiative includes, but is not limited to: Telehealth technologies for remote evaluation and Devices or sensors for point-of-care assessment Devices for in-home monitoring.

Mobile, portable assessment and therapeutic Devices which integrate assessment, diagnosis and Devices that do not require special training. Devices that can operate in low-resource Non-invasive technologies for assessment, Integrated, automated systems to assess or monitor a specific condition.

Some specific examples include: Development of a HHC kiosk, allowing low cost hearing testing and hearing aid fitting, for underserved patients or in underserved geographic areas. Services might include hearing testing and/or hearing aid fitting, adjustment, user training, and diagnostic services. Use of the internet for hearing testing, hearing aid fitting and adjustment, patient education and followup.

The development of calibration systems for Telephone and internet screening systems. Use of currently available basic technology (e.g. phone lines, internet, universal remote controls, home audiovisual equipment, smart phones) to promote patient education, surveillance of hearing loss, hearing aid maintenance, and patient-clinician communication.

Technologies minimizing the need for multiple patient visits to a practitioner’s office.

Development of automated eudiometry with potential for implementation beyond the traditional clinical or research Development of low cost self-fitting hearing aids that improve accessibility though appropriate use of new or existing technology, after special consideration of patient needs for limited dexterity, cosmesis, selection, fitting, and aftercare.

Applications may seek to increase access to HHC by using existing instrumentation, if the proposed intervention will be provided in a format likely to be significantly more affordable, culturally acceptable, or readily used by patients.

Since the core challenge of this FOA is delivery of HHC to users that have not accessed this service in the past, atypical and/or novel strategies for commercialization are encouraged Application Types Allowed New (Phase I, Fast-Track) Resubmission (all phases) Phase IIB Competing Renewal (Phase IIB, formerly Phase II Competing Renewal) Glossary and the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide provide details on these application types.

Funds Available and Anticipated Number of Awards NIDCD intends to commit approximately $4,000,000 in total costs in FY 2012 to fund 3-5 new grants in response to this FOA. According to statutory guidelines, total funding support normally may not exceed $150,000 for Phase I awards and $1,000,000 for Phase II awards. Applicants are encouraged to propose a budget that is reasonable and appropriate for completion of the research project.

Phase IIB budgets must be submitted in accordance with participating IC-specific budget limitations described in the current SBIR/STTR Program Descriptions and Research Topics of the NIH, CDC and FDA. According to statutory guidelines, award periods normally may not exceed 6 months for Phase I and 2 years for Phase II.

Applicants are encouraged to propose a project duration period that is reasonable and appropriate for completion of the research project. described in the NIH Grants Policy Statement will apply to the applications submitted and awards made in response to this FOA. Section III.

Eligibility Information Only United States small business concerns (SBCs) are eligible to submit applications for this opportunity. A small business concern is one that, at the time of award of Phase I and Phase II, meets all of the following criteria: 1.

Is organized for profit, with a place of business located in the United States, which operates primarily within the United States or which makes a significant contribution to the United States economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or labor; 2.

Is in the legal form of an individual proprietorship, partnership, limited liability company, corporation, joint venture, association, trust or cooperative, except that where the form is a joint venture, there can be no more than 49 percent participation by foreign business entities in the joint 3.

Is at least 51 percent owned and controlled by one or more individuals who are citizens of, or permanent resident aliens in, the United States, or it must be a for-profit business concern that is at least 51% owned and controlled by another for-profit business concern that is at least 51% owned and controlled by one or more individuals who are citizens of, or permanent resident aliens in, the United States, except in the case of a joint venture, where each entity to the venture must be 51 percent owned and controlled by one or more individuals who are citizens of, or permanent resident aliens in, the United States; and; 4.

Has, including its affiliates, not more than 500 employees. SBCs must also meet the other regulatory requirements found in 13 C. F.

R. Part 121. Business concerns, other than investment companies licensed, or state development companies qualifying under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, 15 U.S.C.

661, et seq. , are affiliates of one another when either directly or indirectly, (a) one concern controls or has the power to control the other; or (b) a third-party/parties controls or has the power to control both. Business concerns include, but are not limited to, any individual (sole proprietorship) partnership, corporation, joint venture, association, or cooperative.

The SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide should be referenced for detailed eligibility information. Applicant organizations must complete the following registrations as described in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide to be eligible to apply for or receive an award.

Applicants must have a valid Dun and Bradstreet Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number in order to begin each of the Contractor Registration (CCR) must maintain an active registration, to be renewed at least annually All Program Directors/Principal Investigators (PD/PIs) must also work with their institutional officials to register with the eRA Commons or ensure their existing eRA Commons account is affiliated with the eRA Commons account of the applicant organization.

All registrations must be completed by the application due date. Applicant organizations are strongly encouraged to start the registration process at least four (4) weeks prior to the application due date.

Eligible Individuals (Project Director/Principal Investigator) Any individual(s) with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research as the Project Director/Principal Investigator (PD/PI) is invited to work with his/her organization to develop an application for support.

Individuals from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as individuals with disabilities are always encouraged to apply Under the SBIR program, for both Phase I and Phase II, the primary employment of the PD/PI must be with the small business concern at the time of award and during the conduct of the proposed project. For projects with multiple PD/PIs, at least one must meet the primary employment requirement.

Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may occur The SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide should be referenced for specific details on eligibility requirements. For institutions/organizations proposing multiple PDs/PIs, see Multiple Principal Investigators section of the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide. This FOA does not require cost sharing as defined in the NIH Grants 3.

Additional Information on Applicant organizations may submit more than one application, provided that each application is scientifically distinct. NIH will not accept similar grant applications with essentially the same research focus from the same applicant organization.

This includes derivative or multiple applications that propose to develop a single product, process, or service that, with non-substantive modifications, can be applied to a variety of purposes.

Applicants may not simultaneously submit identical/essentially identical applications under both this funding opportunity and any other HHS funding opportunity, including the SBIR and STTR NIH will not accept any application in response to this FOA that is essentially the same as one currently pending initial merit review unless the applicant withdraws the pending application.

NIH will not accept any application that is essentially the same as one already reviewed. Resubmission applications may be submitted, according to the NIH Policy on Resubmission Applications from the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide.

A Phase I awardee may submit a Phase II application either before or after expiration of the Phase I budget period, unless the awardee elects to submit a Phase I and Phase II application concurrently under the Fast-Track procedure. To maintain eligibility to seek Phase II support, a Phase I awardee should submit a Phase II application within the first six due dates following the expiration of the Phase I budget period.

Contractual/Consortium Arrangements In Phase I, normally, a minimum of two-thirds or 67% of the research or analytical effort must be carried out by the small business concern.

The total amount of all consultant and contractual arrangements to third parties for portions of the scientific and technical effort generally may not exceed 33% of the total amount requested (direct, F&A/indirect, and In Phase II, normally, a minimum of one-half or 50% of the research or analytical effort must be carried out by the small business concern.

The total amount of consultant and contractual arrangements to third parties for portions of the scientific and technical effort generally may not exceed 50% of the total Phase II amount requested (direct, F&A/indirect, and fee).

The basis for determining the percentage of work to be performed by each of the cooperative parties in Phase I or Phase II will be the total of the requested costs attributable to each party, unless otherwise described and justified in Consortium/Contractual Arrangements of the PHS398 Research Plan component of SF424 (R&R) application forms.

Additional details are contained in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application The basis for determining the percentage of work to be performed by each of the cooperative parties in Phase I or Phase II will be the total of the requested costs attributable to each party, unless otherwise described and justified in Consortium/Contractual Arrangements of the PHS398 Research Plan component of SF424 (R&R) application forms.

Additional details are contained in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Section IV. Application and Submission 1. Requesting an Application Package Applicants must download the SF424 (R&R) application package associated with this funding opportunity using the Apply for Grant Electronically button in this FOA or following the directions provided at Grants.

gov . 2. Content and Form of Application Submission It is critical that applicants follow the instructions in (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide , except where instructed in this funding opportunity announcement to do otherwise.

Conformance to the requirements in the Application Guide is required and strictly enforced. Applications that are out of compliance with these instructions may be delayed or not accepted for review.

Although a letter of intent is not required, is not binding, and does not enter into the review of a subsequent application, the information that it contains allows IC staff to estimate the potential review workload and By the date listed in Part 1.

Overview Information , prospective applicants are asked to submit a letter of intent that includes the following information: Descriptive title of proposed research Name, address, and telephone number of the PD(s)/PI(s) Names of other key personnel Participating institutions Number and title of this funding opportunity The letter of intent should be sent to: Division of Scientific Programs 6120 Executive Blvd EPS 400C MSC 7180 Telephone: (301) 402-3458 Required and Optional Components The forms package associated with this FOA includes all applicable components, mandatory and optional.

Please note that some components marked optional in the application package are required for application submission. Follow all instructions in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide to ensure you complete all appropriate All page limitations described in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide and the Table of Page Limits must be followed.

PHS 398 Research Plan Component All instructions in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Individuals are required to comply with the instructions for the Resource Sharing Plans (Data Sharing Plan, Sharing Model Organisms, and Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) as provided in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide. Do not use the appendix to circumvent page limits.

Note that Phase I SBIR/STTR Appendix materials are not permitted , unless requested specifically by NIH SBIR/STTR The instructions for the Appendix of the Research Plan are described in the SF424 (R&R) 3. Submission Dates and Times Part I. Overview Information contains information about Key Dates.

Applicants are encouraged to submit in advance of the deadline to ensure they have time to make any application corrections that might be necessary for successful submission. Organizations must submit applications via Grants. gov , the online portal to find and apply for grants across all Federal agencies.

Applicants must then complete the submission process by tracking the status of the application in the eRA Commons , NIH’s electronic system for grants responsible for viewing their application in the eRA Commons to ensure accurate and successful submission. Information on the submission process and a definition of on-time submission are provided in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide. 4.

Intergovernmental Review (E. O. 12372) This initiative is not subject to intergovernmental All NIH awards are subject to the terms and conditions, cost principles, and other considerations described in the NIH Grants Policy Pre-award costs are allowable only as described in the NIH Grants 6.

Other Submission Requirements and Information Applications must be submitted electronically following the instructions described in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Instructions. Paper applications will Applicants must complete all required registrations before the application due date. Section III.

Eligibility Information contains information about registration. For assistance with your electronic application or for more information on the electronic submission All PD/PIs must include their eRA Commons ID in the Credential field of the Senior/Key Person Profile Component of the SF 424(R&R) Application Package .

Failure to register in the Commons and to include a valid PD/PI Commons ID in the credential field will prevent the successful submission of an electronic application to NIH. The applicant organization must ensure that the DUNS number it provides on the application is the same number used in the organization’s profile in the eRA Commons and for the Central Contractor Registration (CCR).

Additional information may be found in the SF424 (R&R) SBIR/STTR Application Guide. tips for avoiding common errors. Upon receipt, applications will be evaluated for completeness by the Center for Scientific Review and responsiveness by components of participating organizations , NIH.

Applications that are incomplete and/or nonresponsive will not be reviewed. Post Submission Materials Applicants are required to follow the instructions for post-submission materials, as described in NOT-OD-10-115 . V.

Application Review Information Only the review criteria described below will be considered in the review process. As part of the NIH mission , all applications submitted to the NIH in support of biomedical and behavioral research are evaluated for scientific and technical merit through the NIH peer review system.

Reviewers will provide an overall impact/priority score to reflect their assessment of the likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved, in consideration of the following review criteria and additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed).

Reviewers will consider each of the review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. An application does not need to be strong in all categories to be judged likely to have major scientific impact. For example, a project that by its nature is not innovative may be essential to advance a field.

Does the project address an important problem or a critical barrier to progress in the field? If the aims of the project are achieved, how will scientific knowledge, technical capability, and/or clinical practice be improved? How will successful completion of the aims change the concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, services, or preventative interventions that drive this field?

Does the proposed project have commercial potential to lead to a marketable product, process or service? (In the case of Phase II, Fast-Track, and Phase II Competing Renewals, does the Commercialization Plan demonstrate a high probability of commercialization?) Does the project address specific healthcare requirements of an underserved population and propose ways to address those needs?

Does the project support development of devices that enable large reductions in cost, relative to devices that perform a similar function and already in the marketplace? Are the PD/PIs, collaborators, and other researchers well suited to the project? If Early Stage Investigators or New Investigators, or in the early stages of independent careers, do they have appropriate experience and training?

If established, have they demonstrated an ongoing record of accomplishments that have advanced their field(s)? If the project is collaborative or multi-PD/PI, do the investigators have complementary and integrated expertise; are their leadership approach, governance and organizational structure appropriate for the project?

Does the application challenge and seek to shift current research or clinical practice paradigms by utilizing novel theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions? Are the concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions novel to one field of research or novel in a broad sense?

Is a refinement, improvement, or new application of theoretical concepts, approaches or methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions proposed?

If the proposed intervention will make use of existing instrumentation, will it be provided in a format likely to be more affordable, culturally acceptable, or readily used by Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the project? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented?

If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be If the project involves clinical research, are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed?

If atypical strategies for commercialization are proposed, are these likely to provide HHC to users that have not accessed this service in the past? Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed?

Will the project benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative Additional Review Criteria As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will evaluate the following additional items while determining scientific and technical merit, and in providing an overall impact/priority score, but will not give separate scores for these items.

For Phase II Applications, how well did the applicant demonstrate progress toward meeting the Phase I objectives, demonstrating feasibility, and providing a solid foundation for the proposed Phase II Phase I/Phase II Fast-Track Applications For Phase I/Phase II Fast-Track Applications, reviewers will consider the following: 1.

Does the Phase I application specify clear, appropriate, measurable goals (milestones) that should be achieved prior to initiating Phase II? 2.

To what extent was the applicant able to obtain letters of interest, additional funding commitments, and/or resources from the private sector or non-SBIR/STTR funding sources that would enhance the likelihood for Protections for Human Subjects For research that involves human subjects but does not involve one of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate the justification for involvement of human subjects and the proposed protections from research risk relating to their participation according to the following five review criteria: 1) risk to subjects, 2) adequacy of protection against risks, 3) potential benefits to the subjects and others, 4) importance of the knowledge to be gained, and 5) data and safety monitoring for clinical trials.

For research that involves human subjects and meets the criteria for one or more of the six categories of research that are exempt under 45 CFR Part 46, the committee will evaluate: 1) the justification for the exemption, 2) human subjects involvement and characteristics, and 3) sources of materials. For additional information on review of the Human Subjects section, please refer to Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines .

Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children When the proposed project involves clinical research, the committee will evaluate the proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and members of both genders, as well as the inclusion of children. For additional information on review of the Inclusion section, please refer to the Human Subjects Protection and Inclusion Guidelines .

The committee will evaluate the involvement of live vertebrate animals as part of the scientific assessment according to the following five points: 1) proposed use of the animals, and species, strains, ages, sex, and numbers to be used; 2) justifications for the use of animals and for the appropriateness of the species and numbers proposed; 3) adequacy of veterinary care; 4) procedures for limiting discomfort, distress, pain and injury to that which is unavoidable in the conduct of scientifically sound research including the use of analgesic, anesthetic, and tranquilizing drugs and/or comfortable restraining devices; and 5) methods of euthanasia and reason for selection if not consistent with the AVMA Guidelines on Euthanasia.

For additional information on review of the Vertebrate Animals section, please for Review of the Vertebrate Animal Section . Reviewers will assess whether materials or procedures proposed are potentially hazardous to research personnel and/or the environment, and if needed, determine whether adequate protection is proposed.

For Resubmissions, the committee will evaluate the application as now presented, taking into consideration the responses to comments from the previous scientific review group and changes made to the For Renewals, the committee will consider the progress made in the last funding period.

For Phase IIB Applications (formerly called Phase II Competing Renewals), the committee will consider the progress made in the last Additional Review Considerations As applicable for the project proposed, reviewers will consider each of the following items, but will not give scores for these items, and should not consider them in providing an overall impact/priority score.

Reviewers will assess the information provided in this section of the application, including 1) the Select Agent(s) to be used in the proposed research, 2) the registration status of all entities where Select Agent(s) will be used, 3) the procedures that will be used to monitor possession use and transfer of Select Agent(s), and 4) plans for appropriate biosafety, biocontainment, and security of the Select Agent(s).

Reviewers will comment on whether the following Resource Sharing Plans, or the rationale for not sharing the following types of resources, are reasonable: 1) Data Sharing Plan ; 2) Sharing Model Organisms ; and 3) Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS) . Budget and Period of Support Reviewers will consider whether the budget and the requested period of support are fully justified and reasonable in relation to 2.

Review and Selection Process Applications will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by (an) appropriate Scientific Review Group(s) convened by the Center for Scientific Review (assignments will be shown in the eRA Commons), in review policy and procedures , using the stated review As part of the scientific peer review, all applications: May undergo a committee process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific and technical merit (generally the top half of applications under review), will be discussed and assigned an overall Will receive a written critique.

Applications will be assigned