1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsSupports the creation of standards for data from personal tracking devices to facilitate research access, aiming to establish standards akin to DICOM for medical images.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Public and state institutions of higher education; Private institutions of higher education. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The published deadline was September 25, 2026, which has passed. Check the official notice for any future application windows before investing time in a proposal.
Standardizing Data and Metadata from Wearable Devices (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed) is funded by National Institutes of Health. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
Measurement Science and Engineering (MSE) Research Grant Programs (ITL Grant Program) is sponsored by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The ITL Grant Program provides financial assistance to support research consistent with the ITL's mission to support research in fields such as Applied and Computational Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Big Data Analytics, Cloud Computing, Cybersecurity, High-Performance Co…
SecureAI is the European Cybersecurity Competence Centre's dedicated topic for the security of AI systems themselves, and it is worth distinguishing carefully from the much larger population of Horizon Europe topics that apply AI to some other domain. The scope here is the attack surface of the models: adversarial attacks, backdoor injections and data poisoning are named explicitly, alongside privacy and robustness of AI models and systems more broadly. For teams working on model security, red-teaming, robustness certification, privacy-preserving machine learning or supply-chain integrity of training data, this is a rare topic where that work is the subject rather than a workpackage. The topic carries a budget of 21,200,000 euros and shares a deadline of 15 September 2026 at 17:00 CET with two sibling topics in the same ECCC call: HORIZON-CL3-2026-02-CS-ECCC-01 on approaches and tools for security in software and hardware development and assessment, budgeted at 20,000,000 euros and itself referencing AI-driven security testing methodologies, and HORIZON-CL3-2026-02-CS-ECCC-03 on advanced cryptographic schemes and high-assurance high-speed cryptographic implementations at 15,000,000 euros. Applicants weighing where a proposal fits should read all three topic texts, because the boundary between securing AI and using AI to secure software runs directly between topics 02 and 01. As with all Horizon Europe collaborative topics, proposals are expected from consortia spanning multiple Member States or Associated Countries rather than from single organisations, and evaluation is against the published topic-specific expected outcomes.
This ECCC topic funds security in the software and hardware development lifecycle, and it earns a place on an AI funding list for a specific reason: AI-driven security testing methodologies are named as a contribution area within scope. That makes it the natural home for work applying machine learning to vulnerability discovery, fuzzing, static and dynamic analysis, secure code generation and assessment, and automated assurance of hardware designs - work that often sits awkwardly between AI calls that want novel models and security calls that want no AI at all. It should be read alongside its sibling topic in the same call, HORIZON-CL3-2026-02-CS-ECCC-02 SecureAI, which covers the opposite direction: securing AI models and systems themselves against adversarial attacks, backdoor injections and data poisoning, with a budget of 21,200,000 euros. The boundary between using AI to secure software and securing AI runs precisely between these two topics, and choosing the wrong one is a common and costly proposal error. A third sibling, HORIZON-CL3-2026-02-CS-ECCC-03, covers advanced cryptographic schemes and high-assurance high-speed cryptographic implementations at 15,000,000 euros. All three share a deadline of 15 September 2026 at 17:00 CET. The topic budget here is 20,000,000 euros. As a Horizon Europe collaborative topic, proposals are expected from multi-country consortia rather than single organisations, and cybersecurity topics under Cluster 3 commonly carry additional participation restrictions relating to control by entities from non-associated third countries, so the topic conditions need reading in full before consortium building starts.
PA-27-037 consolidates the Predoctoral to Postdoctoral Transition Award into a single parent announcement across 20 NIH components, with the next deadline December 8, 2026. The eligibility gate is not the science — it is a mandatory change of institution and mentor between the F99 and K00 phases.
Read articleA draft executive order would have put OMB Director Russell Vought on a commission with final say over NIH awards after peer review. Sen. Collins killed it by pointing at a provision Congress already passed. Here is what the episode teaches applicants about the December 11 cliff.
Read articlePA-27-034, PA-27-035 and PA-27-036 replace the institute-specific R25 announcements that research education programs have been built around for a decade. NCI, NIDA and NIGMS have already expired theirs early. Here is what the consolidation actually changes: an 8% indirect cost ceiling, a US-citizens-and-permanent-residents participant rule, a cooperative agreement variant that only exists on one of the three, and no clinical-trial-allowed companion anywhere.
Read article