1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsState Board Programming Regrants is sponsored by Tennessee Historical Records Advisory Board (THRAB). Provides funding for historical records projects in Tennessee, including digitization efforts.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Government entities or non-profit organizations holding permanent, historically valuable archival collections in Tennessee. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $5,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
State Board Programming Regrants is funded by Tennessee Historical Records Advisory Board (THRAB). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Tennessee. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
The May 29, 2026 OMB proposed rewrite of 2 CFR 200 is being read primarily as a cost-principles document. The structural change that will reshape how federal grants get decided is proposed §200.205, which requires senior political appointees to conduct a pre-issuance review of all discretionary awards — and the companion provision that makes peer-review recommendations 'advisory only' and not binding on agency decision-makers. The combined effect is the subordination of merit review to political review across NSF, NIH, DOE, USDA, and every other agency that runs peer-reviewed grant competitions. Why this is structurally different from prior administrations' political influence, what the 45-day comment window means for affected institutions, and the strategy for applicants whose proposals will be reviewed under the new framework starting October 1, 2026.
Read articleThe headlines on OMB's May 29 rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 have focused on §200.205's political pre-issuance review. The structurally larger change is a single sentence in §200.205(d) that says peer review recommendations 'remain advisory and are not ministerially ratified' by the federal agency. That language demotes the peer-review-driven funding model that has defined the NIH, NSF, NEH, and DOE Office of Science research portfolios for fifty years to one input among several — replacing a presumption that scored panels drive funding decisions with a presumption that political appointees do. Comment deadline July 13, effective October 1.
Read articleTennessee's $206.9M RHTP allocation begins distribution with a 30-day virtual maternal/child mental health consultation grant. The state plans a new opportunity every Friday — the cadence and structure here are the blueprint for how the $50B nationwide program rolls out.
Read article