1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsTalent Ready Connections Grant is sponsored by Talent Ready Utah (Utah Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity). This grant aims to support the expansion of work-based learning and apprenticeship opportunities throughout Utah.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Talent Ready Utah - Utah System of Higher Education In 2018, Talent Ready Utah was legislatively created to be an industry-facing department within the then Governor’s Office of Economic Development (now Governor’s Office of Economic Opportunity) to convene industry, education, state agencies, and other key stakeholders to create, expand, and align short-term and long-term workforce development solutions to the needs of industry.
Talent Ready Utah manages and administers multiple targeted workforce development state appropriations through grants awarded to local education agencies (LEAs) and higher education institutions based on regional workforce needs that are data-driven and backed by industry. On July 1, 2022, Talent Ready Utah was officially moved to the Utah System of Higher Education in the Office of the Commissioner.
Talent Ready Utah now reports to the Commissioner of Higher Education.
According to statute, Talent Ready Utah shall coordinate with the state’s Talent Board to; Further education and industry alignment in the state; Coordinate the development of new education programs that align with industry demand; Coordinate or partner with other state agencies to administer grant programs; Promote the inclusion of industry partners in education; Provide outreach and information to employers regarding workforce programs and initiatives; Develop and analyze stackable credential programs; Determine efficiencies among workforce providers; Map available workforce programs focusing on programs that successfully create high-paying jobs; and Support initiatives of the Talent Board.
Talent Ready Utah Programs Higher Education Workforce Programs Deep Tech / Emerging Tech Healthcare Workforce Initiative Targeted Workforce – Healthcare Behavioral Health Technician Life Science Workforce Initiative Computer Science Master Plan computer Science for Utah Grants Talent Ready Apprenticeship Connections TRU Work-based Learning Programs Utah’s Architecture, Engineering & Construction Pathway Talent, Education, and Industry Alignment Board Charter To provide Talent Ready Utah with strategic direction for workforce alignment with state educational partners.
To provide oversite of TRU initiatives in working proactively with industry and state stakeholders to develop and implement short-term and long-term workforce programs. To direct and facilitate progress, performance, and effectiveness of programs involved with employment training and relative placements.
Ensure that workforce programs and alignment efforts are consistent with state workforce projections, are data-driven to target industries, and align with high-demand occupations.
Make recommendations to the Utah Board of Higher Education and the Unified Economic Opportunity Commission regarding policy and funding requests to; Coordinate the development of new education programs that align with industry; Collaborate with other state agencies to administer grant programs; Provide outreach and information to employers regarding workforce programs; and Develop and analyze stackable credential programs and map workforce programs focused on successfully creating and supporting high-paying jobs.
Develop Talent Advisory Councils to support Talent Initiatives created by the UBHE. Deidre Henderson or designee — Lt.
Governor Neil Abercrombie — Governor’s Education Advisor Senator Ann Millner, Chair — Senate Member Representative Jefferson Moss — House Member Geoff Landward— USHE Commissioner Ryan Starks or designee — Go Utah Executive Director Casey Cameron or designee — DWS Executive Director Margaret Busse or designee — Commerce Executive Director Sydnee Dickson — USBE Superintendent Jim Moss — USBE Board Member Derek Miller — SLC Chamber President Members of industry representing targeted clusters Members to advise Talent Ready Utah on the current state and future state of talent needs from industry and regional perspectives.
Members will serve as ad-hoc co-chairs in Industry Alignment Workgroups. Co-Chairs will facilitate industry engagements to identify areas of need for education and industry alignment.
Joshua Aikens — CPO, Zono’s – Southwest Erin Casale — Customer, Qualtrics – Mountainland Rick Allen — VP, BAE – Wasatch North Chuck Taylor — CEO, Syberjet – Southwest Jeff Neilson — CEO, Nelson Labs – Wasatch South Will Clive — Chief of Staff, Pluralsight Heather Brace — VP of HR, IHC – Statewide Jake Hinkley — Director Workforce, Sunroc Statewide Alison O’Mohany — VP, Seek Labs Sidni Shorter — CEO, Black Chamber Juan Pascua — Executive Director, Hispanic Chamber
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Businesses and organizations in Utah focused on expanding work-based learning and apprenticeship opportunities. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Talent Ready Connections Grant is funded by Talent Ready Utah (Utah Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Utah. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
IHI European HealthCare Incubator Network is sponsored by European Commission — Horizon Europe. Expected Impact: The action under this topic is expected to achieve the following impacts and contribute to the following EU policies/initiatives: deliver innovative, early technology solutions that contribute to addressing strategic unmet public health needs across multiple therapy areas to improve prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment; leverage the unique network and scale of IHI JU members to create a pipeline to support innovative startups in the health industry, fully integrated into European initiatives in support of start-ups and entrepreneurship; drive early cross-sector health R&D and innovation to strengthen the European healthcare industry’s global competitiveness, contributing to the EU Industrial Strategy and Pharmaceutical Strategy objectives; create a sustainable network of European healthcare incubators to guide and support highly talented and innovative early-stage companies; harness digital health and data-sharing technologies (e.g., AI and big data) to enable interoperable health solutions, contributing to the European Health Data Space (EHDS) and improved evidence based care;- the action should generate a portfolio of early‑stage companies that have undergone rigorous multi‑industry validation, significantly increasing their credibility with investors, regulators, and healthcare systems. This ‘industry quality seal’ should enhance the selected startups’ ability to secure follow‑on financing; by integrating corporate expertise into a pan‑European incubator network, the action should reduce fragmentation, support faster clinical and eventually commercial decision‑making, and enable more innovators to navigate regulatory and reimbursement pathways successfully. This should contribute to the objectives of the EU to accelerate the translation of research into deployable health technologies. The Network should serve as a feeder mechanism into wider EU support structures, ensuring that promising companies can transition smoothly into later‑stage funding and scale‑up opportunities. This complementarity should maximise the added value of EU public funding while avoiding duplication and reinforcing Europe’s position as a globally competitive hub for health innovation. The action under this topic should synergise with relevant EU programmes and contribute to several key EU strategies and policies: Life Science strategy, the proposed Biotech Act (especially the biotechnology development accelerators as referred to in article 5 of the Commission proposal), Industrial strategy, Pharmaceutical strategy, EU4Health Programme, Digital Europe Programme, Testing and Experimental Facility for Health AI and Robotic (TEF-Health), European Innovation Council (EIC) programmes, EU Competitive Compass, Choose Europe initiative, Startup and Scale-up strategy by the European Commission. Additionally, the action under this topic should synergise with the forthcoming European Startup and Scaleup Hubs and, in particular, encourage connection into the Network from the Call ‘European Startup and Scaleup Hub Pilot Call – HORIZON-EIE-2026-02-CONNECT-01’. Furthermore, the action has the potential to support Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan, EU Mission on Cancer, Healthier Together – EU Non-Communicable diseases initiative, Joint Action for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes in Europe, or the Cardiovascular Health Plan. Applicants should demonstrate in the proposal how these synergies will avoid duplication, ensure complementarity with existing EU efforts, and provide early-stage companies with continuity and scale up pathways. Expected Outcome: This call topic responds to the pressing need for a collaborative approach to accelerating the research-to-market pathway and fostering innovation and competitiveness in the European healthcare sector. Accordingly, the action under this topic must contribute to all of the following outcomes: 1. A sustainable European HealthCare Incubator Network (hereafter, the ‘Network’) linking incubators from t Programme areas: Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness, Health, Innovative Health Initiative, Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Keywords: Competitiveness, innovation, research and development, Decrease technological and industrial risks, Health care, Incubator companies, Investment readiness, Related to SME and start-up support, SME support, Start-up companies, European HealthCare Incubator Network, IHI, IHI JU, Innovative Health Initiative, Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking, Joint Undertaking Deadline stages: 2026-10-08, 2027-04-21
NSF-supported science and engineering research increasingly relies on cutting-edge infrastructure. With its Major Research Instrumentation (MRI) program and Major Multi-user Facilities ("Major Facilities") projects, NSF supports infrastructure projects at the lower and higher range of infrastructure project costs, Foundation-wide, across science and engineering research disciplines. The Foundation-wide Mid-scale Research Infrastructure opportunity is intended to provide NSF with an agile, Foundation-wide process to fund experimental research capabilities in the mid-scale range between MRI and Major Multi-user Facilities. NSF defines Research Infrastructure (RI) as any combination of facilities, equipment, instrumentation, or computational hardware or software, and the necessary human capital in support of the same. Major facilities and mid-scale projects are subsets of research infrastructure. The NSF Mid-scale Research Infrastructure-1 Program (Mid-scale RI-1) supports either design activities or implementation of unique and compelling RI projects. Mid-scale implementation projects may include any combination of equipment, instrumentation, cyberinfrastructure, broadly used large scale datasets and the personnel needed to successfully commission the project. Mid-scale RI-1 design activities include the design efforts intended to lead to eventual implementation of a mid-scale class RI project. Mid-scale RI-1 projects should involve the training of a diverse workforce engaged in the design and implementation of STEM research infrastructure. Mid-scale RI-1 projects should directly enable advances in any of the research domains supported by NSF. Projects may also include upgrades to existing research infrastructure. Mid-scale RI-1 emphasizes strong scientific merit, a response to an identified need of the research community and/or fulfillment of a national need to enable U.S. researchers to be competitive in a global research environment. Well-conceived technical and management plans are essential for both design and implementation proposals, as are well-developed plans (e.g., mentoring and professional development) for student training and the involvement of a diverse STEM workforce in all aspects of mid-scale design and/or implementation activities. The inclusion of individual project participants that will lead to a supportive working environment is especially encouraged at all levels of the project team. Within Mid-scale RI-1, proposers may submit two types of projects, “Implementation” (e.g., acquisition and/or construction) or “Design”. The “Design” track is intended to facilitate progress toward readiness for a mid-scale range implementation project. Both Implementation projects and Design activities may involve new or upgraded research infrastructure. Mid-scale RI-1 "Implementation" projects may have a total project cost ranging from $4 million up to but not including $20 million. Mid-scale RI-1 "Design" activities may request less than $4 million, with a minimum request of $400,000 and a maximum request up to but not including $20 million, as appropriate, to prepare for a future mid-scale range implementation project. Note: Successful award of a Mid-scale RI-1 design activity does not imply NSF's commitment to the future implementation of the project being designed, nor is a Mid-scale RI-1 design award required for the submission of an implementation project. The Mid-scale RI-1 Program seeks to broaden the representation of PIs and institutions in its award portfolio, including a geographically diverse set of institutions (especially those in EPSCoR jurisdictions). Proposals submitted by, or involving partnerships between institutions are encouraged. Participation in this opportunity is encouraged for the full spectrum of diverse talent society has to offer to include PIs who are women, early-career researchers, persons with disabilities, or members of other groups underrepresented in STEM. To improve participation in science and engineering research for persons with disabilities, Mid-scale RI-1 encourages PIs to incorporate accessibility as part of Mid-scale RI-1 design activity and implementation projects. Please consult NSF's Research Infrastructure Guide, or RIG (available at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/lfo/lfo_documents.jsp), for definitions of certain terms used in this solicitation, such as the Project Execution Plan (PEP) and Design and Execution Plan (DEP). The RIG provides guidance specific to Mid-scale Research Infrastructure Projects, including references to other parts of the RIG as needed. Note that PEP or DEP should be appropriately scaled for the complexity of the project and may not require all of the elements described in the RIG. Mid-scale research infrastructure projects with total project costs beyond the Mid-scale RI-1 Program limit are separately solicited through the Mid-scale RI-2 Program. Proposals to the Mid-scale RI-1 Program with total project costs outside of this solicitation's budgetary limits, either during initial submission or after cost analyses/revisions during subsequent review, are subject to return without further review. Funding Opportunity Number: 24-598. Assistance Listing: 47.041,47.049,47.050,47.070,47.074,47.075,47.076,47.079,47.083,47.084. Funding Instrument: G. Category: ST. Award Amount: $4M – $20M per award.
NASA published an RFI on September 12, 2026 seeking states willing to host and sponsor the new United States Space Academy, with responses due October 26 at 6 p.m. EDT through SAM.gov. Only a governor or a governor's designee may submit, and only once per state. The timeline demands groundbreaking by 2027, 300 students in temporary facilities in 2028, and a permanent campus by 2031. Here is what that structure actually means for universities, economic development agencies, and contractors in the states that compete.
Read articleNSF 26-508 (TechAccess: AI-Ready America) puts up to $224 million behind as many as 56 statewide coordination hubs — $1 million a year for three years each — to make businesses, governments, and workers AI-ready. Here is what a hub actually does, who can lead one, why round one is the round to win, and how to approach the July 16 deadline.
Read articleNSF 26-501 (CAMEL) commits $9 million to build AI-ready K-12 mathematics datasets across 6–7 awards of up to $1.5 million each. The money is co-supported by the Walton Family Foundation — and the solicitation bars WFF staff and partners from participating in any capacity, prohibits voluntary cost sharing, and requires reports be shared with the foundation after NSF review. Here's how the public-private structure works, and what Phase II means for teams already in.
Read article