1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsTeaching Transformed Grants is sponsored by University of Michigan, LSA Technology Services. Provides grants to faculty with little-to-no experience using technology in teaching to explore technology-based pedagogies.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
## Who Can Apply for a Teaching Transformed Grant? Teaching Transformed grants are open to all instructional staff in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Eligibility to apply for funding does not ensure that funding will be granted.
Up to$12,500 for two years, with the possibility of a$5,000 faculty stipend ($2,500/year for two years).
Among the items that **may be included** in the budget request are: * Hourly wages for student assistance (graduate students or undergraduates) * Software not available through U-M or LSA Technology Services * Costs for digitizing images and texts * Fees for access to databases * One-time equipment purchases * Consultant fees for technical support * External programmers or application developers * Project evaluation expenses Items that**require significant rationale**to clarify exceptional circumstances: * Travel and registration fees for relevant conferences, seminars, training, or workshops for graduate students or undergraduates * Laptop and desktop computers or upgrades Items that may **NOT be included**in the budget request are: * Cost of on-going cycle of replacements for equipment * Tuition for student assistants ## Applying for a Teaching Transformed Grant Proposals should be clear about the nature and significance of the project’s impact on undergraduate teaching and student learning.
Proposals should describe: * The need for professional development and improvement of a faculty member’s expertise in information technology, as well as the effort required to use instructional technologies in teaching undergraduate courses (a letter from the department chair or program director is recommended) * The faculty member’s potential for and commitment to professional growth learning to use technology in the course project and in future courses * A description of the project and the technology to be explored or implemented * The approach to be taken in developing the relevant expertise or adopting the instructional innovation in new or existing courses * How the project meets the priorities of the department and college * How success of the project will be determined and evaluated * Any additional assistance that will be needed to collect resources, prepare materials, set up templates, create workflows, and other work required for the project.
Proposals should identify if departmental student staff is available or if outside assistances will be necessary Strong encouragement is given to faculty who wish to explore new instructional technologies and gain new skills, even when they are not fully confident that the venture will succeed.
The committee reviewing proposals welcomes efforts to extend the frontiers of teaching with technology, even while it supports the implementation of proven technologies.
Preference is given to proposals that clearly illustrate how the Teaching Transformed grant will develop the instructional technology skills of faculty members so that they may successfully apply those in classes and make ongoing contributions to undergraduate instruction in the College after the funded project is successfully completed.
**_Please note:_** Proposals for Teaching Transformed Grants must include a letter of support from the faculty member’s department chair or program director, addressing the need of the faculty member to receive additional professional development, as well as the impact of the project 0n the department/curriculum. The letter can be uploaded with the proposal form or sent directly to Monika Dressler (mdressle@umich. edu).
If your grant proposal is approved, a report on the project should be submitted within a year. **Complete the steps below to apply for a grant:**
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Instructional staff in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts at the University of Michigan. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $12,500. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Teaching Transformed Grants is funded by University of Michigan, LSA Technology Services. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Michigan. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
On August 26, 2026, NSF named the STC class of 2026: TEMPEST at Michigan State, GENIE at Northwestern, and a human-robot co-adaptation center at UT Austin. $90 million total, $6 million a year each. The 2023 class was four centers and $120 million. The award size is intact; the shelf space shrank 25 percent — and that is the number that should reshape how you plan a center proposal.
Read articleThe Hewlett Foundation's Emerging Technology and Security Initiative commits $20 million a year through 2031 across AI, biotechnology, and quantum computing security. Its 2026 exploratory grants went to thirteen named institutions with no open call. For organizations outside that list, the path in runs through a specific set of moves — and the five-year term starting in 2027 is the window.
Read articleThe full ASPECT NOFO (DE-FOA-0003647) posted September 4, 2026, eleven days later than the Notice of Intent predicted. The real document splits $58 million across two topic areas with anticipated award counts of 0-7 and 0-3, a cost share that jumps from 20 percent to 50 percent mid-project, a mandatory five-page concept paper due October 9, and a university eligibility restriction that decides team structure before anyone writes a word.
Read article