Trust and confidence in policing: Research & Innovation Consortium

Trust and confidence in policing: Research & Innovation Consortium is sponsored by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). Trust and confidence in policing: Research & Innovation Consortium. Funding opportunity from Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC).

Apply via the UKRI portal.

Trust and confidence in policing: Research & Innovation Consortium – UKRI Funding opportunity: Trust and confidence in policing: Research & Innovation Consortium Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) , Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) , Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) , Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) , Medical Research Council (MRC) , Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) , Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) , UK Research and Innovation 1 September 2026 9:00am UK time 27 October 2026 4:00pm UK time Apply for funding to develop and test dynamic tools and approaches to measure public trust and confidence in policing.

The consortium will develop methods to capture the views of the wider community, underrepresented groups, groups who are a priority for policing and their partners, with particular focus on the voices of under-18s and victims and survivors of violence against women and girls. Project leads must be based at a UK research organisation eligible for UKRI funding. The full economic cost (FEC) of your project can be up to £2 million.

UKRI will fund 80% of the FEC. The Consortium must start by 1 February 2027 for a duration of 36 months. This opportunity is open to organisations with standard eligibility.

Check if your organisation is eligible The project lead must be based at a UK research organisation eligible for UKRI funding . Business, third sector or government body Individuals from business, third sector or government body organisations based in the UK can be included on applications as a project co-lead.

Please read the project co-leads from business, third sector or government bodies policy guidance for details of eligible organisations and costs. International researchers International researchers can apply as ‘project co-lead (international)’. You should include all other international collaborators (or UK partners not based at approved organisations) as project partners.

Equality, diversity and inclusion We are committed to achieving equality of opportunity for all funding applicants. We encourage applications from a diverse range of researchers. We support people to work in a way that suits their personal circumstances.

This includes: support for people with caring responsibilities alternative working patterns UKRI can offer disability and accessibility support for UKRI applicants and grant holders during the application and assessment process. Demand management is not currently being applied to this funding opportunity.

However, should the level of interest exceed what can be managed within the assessment process, UKRI may introduce limits on the number of applications that can be submitted. Further details will be clearly communicated where this is the case. UKRI encourages organisations to support applicants in preparing well-planned, high-quality applications that are competitive for funding relative to the funding opportunity.

The core aims of this consortium are to: develop novel, engaging and dynamic methods which support police and their partners to gain real time feedback on trust and confidence test new and innovative ways of improving trust and confidence in the police As part of the Safer Streets Research and Development Missions Accelerator Programme (R&D MAP), UK Research & Innovation (UKRI) is launching a funding opportunity focused on understanding trust and confidence in policing in the UK.

The aim is to develop new, engaging and dynamic ways of measuring communities’ views, which address gaps in current approaches and remain affordable for police and their partners. Public trust and confidence in policing have declined in recent years, thought to be driven by a range of factors. Strategies, such as the Safer Streets Mission and the Police Reform White Paper, have been introduced to address this.

Currently trust and confidence in policing in England and Wales is measured through several valuable tools, including: Crime Survey for England and Wales (Office for National Statistics) the Public Perceptions Tracker (Independent Office for Police Conduct) Police and Crime Commissioner Local Crime Surveys However, while the currently available tools provide a snapshot of public trust and confidence, they do not provide continuous measurement or at a level of granularity to consistently understand the impact of specific policing activities and interventions.

Further, the voices of less heard groups and communities, such as children, victims and survivors of abuse, and justice involved individuals, can be missing through conventional methods of data collection, limiting the representation included in the data.

The challenge aims to address this limitation by investing in the development of new standardised measures, which provide police with real-time data on trust and confidence in their communities, to guide their interventions and activity. The measures will use evidence based, innovative methods to engage less heard groups, including children, and victims of abuse.

To ensure that outputs are useable by police to guide their activities and interventions, they must be affordable, scalable and appealing to the user. Further, the challenge aims to increase trust and confidence through pilots in at least four areas which identify and test specific policing interventions or approaches.

In combination with the measures, this will build understanding of what works well and less well in building and sustaining trust and confidence. Under this funding opportunity, one Research & Innovation Consortium will be established.

The consortium will bring together academics (including those with research, lived experience or both, within relevant communities), police, community safety and justice leads, policymakers, third sector organisations and community groups, and relevant industry partners, to co-produce innovative, practical and inclusive measures of confidence and trust in policing.

The consortium will engage with police and other organisations to design and implement a series of pilots intended to increase trust and confidence. The impact of these will be tested through the innovative measures.

The consortium must prioritise understanding and capturing the experiences and perceptions of: children under the age of 18 victims of violence against women and girls The consortium should also include other underrepresented groups, prioritised with their local forces, and detail and justify their selection.

However, it is expected that the measures will be able to provide a comprehensive and dynamic indication of trust and confidence in policing across the British public more generally as well.

The consortium is expected to have a core team responsible for delivering its own work packages, but a key feature of the R&I Consortium is its devolved funding pot – a ring-fenced allocation of funding designed to support small-scale pilot projects that test novel, high-risk innovations and that engage with communities.

This flexible funding enables rapid experimentation, encourages bold ideas, builds a larger community of practice, and helps surface approaches with strong potential to scale. Through this structure, the consortium will design and manage workstreams to: provide an initial scoping phase in which proposed measures which intend to address the challenge will be evaluated.

The most promising options will be selected develop tools to address the challenge based on the scoping phase findings refine the tools based on trial and test performance integrate the findings of the trial and test data, with the performance of policing interventions and activity to contribute to a Public Confidence in Policing Playbook.

Throughout the duration of funding the consortium will engage with the UKRI Safer Streets team and associated governance mechanisms, including (but not limited to) the Safer Streets Mission Programme Board. The consortium must be ready to commence projects from 1 February 2027. Development of tools and interventions, available for piloting by December 2027.

Trial testing and refinement by March 2029. Contribution to development of Public Confidence in Policing Playbook by December 2029. Project completion by March 2030.

What is a Research & Innovation Consortium? A R&I Consortium brings together communities from across academia, public sector at various scales, policing, industry and the third sector, with each partner contributing distinct expertise, experience and relationships. Working collaboratively, members of the consortium cocreate tangible, creative and challenge focused outcomes that address a defined issue and results in real-world impact.

To realise the ambitions of this funding opportunity, projects are expected to set out clear plans for engaging and actively collaborating with relevant stakeholders. You should identify the most relevant stakeholders and describe appropriate and meaningful engagement plans.

Potential stakeholders may include, but are not limited to, the police, third sector, community groups, industry, the public sector, people with lived experience and the public. By people with lived experience and the public, we mean both individuals and the groups or organisations that support, work with, facilitate engagement with or represent people with lived experience and the public.

Projects should demonstrate how they will work with the relevant research users and stakeholders they have identified to shape, refine and deliver their work. Engagement should ensure that resulting outcomes are meaningful, usable and accessible to those audiences. This is essential to ensure that the consortium can make a substantive contribution to the development and implementation of measurement tools and approaches.

As the consortium is required to deliver at least four pilots with UK police forces, applicants must demonstrate a track record of collaboration with police forces. Such collaborations should be established by the point of application submission and evidenced by project partner letters of support.

Where formal partnerships are not yet in place, applicants must provide a credible plan demonstrating their ability to rapidly develop relationships and secure police partners if successful. Organisations, police forces and partner agencies that are not included in the successful application will not be excluded from future involvement.

As the consortium develops, opportunities for involvement will be available through the flexible fund, as well as through additional pilots, scaling activities and wider implementation and roll-out efforts.

Collaboration in practice The consortium’s core team should include project co-leads from UK-based research organisations eligible for UKRI funding , and project co-leads from eligible UK-based businesses, third sector organisations and government bodies , and could also include international project co-leads , if relevant.

Representation and inclusion of specialist expertise, drawn from across sectors, disciplines and communities, are vital to support the desired outcomes.

The core team should include people who collectively offer: core social science leadership, with an in-depth understanding of relevant disciplines, policy challenges and evidence needs thematic expertise, place-based expertise or both, beyond the social sciences and beyond academia, reflecting the communities that will be engaged in the consortium (including people with lived experience) an ability to engage and collaborate credibly with diverse stakeholders and research users through a range of activities and outputs an ability to bring together diverse expertise within projects, conceptually, methodologically and theoretically an ability to deliver complex projects to time, considering the variety of activities and outputs specialist expertise including programme and project management, finance expertise, a communications function, administrative support and knowledge mobilisation expertise Applications must include a co-design plan demonstrating how police and members of the target underrepresented communities have been, or will be, involved in designing the tools or approaches before deployment.

Co-design must be genuine and documented, and the application must describe the specific design decisions that co-design will inform. The partnerships formed and research undertaken by the consortium should not be extractive. The consortium must take a transparent, mutually beneficial approach in which the perspectives and priorities of seldom heard communities are respected and meaningfully integrated into outcomes.

Outcomes must therefore work for both the community, and the police. The consortium should articulate its ambition to develop trusted relationships with the communities and stakeholders it engages with. This includes demonstrating how trust and confidence in the project team, the research process, and the proposed co-design activities will be established from the start and maintained throughout.

The consortium will be responsible for the formation of suitable advisory structures. Applications should include detail of the advisory group, including academic and non-academic members, that will support the research and oversee the development of the key activities. UKRI reserves the right to attend and observe advisory group meetings and suggest advisory group members.

Grant holders will also be asked to provide regular and ad hoc project progress reports to UKRI as needed. The duration of this award is 36 months. Projects must start by 1 February 2027.

The FEC of your project can be up to £2 million. UKRI will fund 80% of the FEC. There will be a proportionate review process towards the end of the award and, dependent on the outcome, additional investment may be made available for further trialling or scaling.

innovative workstreams and activities, for example, workshops that help to kick-start new collaborations, support the initial testing of new ideas, test tools/approaches, gather feedback from specific stakeholder/community groups, enable co-creation a flexible fund (designed to support small research projects or pilots) The flexible fund is a ringfenced pot of money that enables the consortium to be responsive, innovative and agile.

Flexible funding can be used to: co-design tools and approaches with communities/particular less well heard groups trial different tools and approaches to test their capability work with underrepresented groups and police partners to understand what does and does not work, with the aim to implement changes and improvements Prototype or instrument design You should budget for at least 40% of the FEC of the consortium to be assigned to the flexible fund.

UKRI will fund 80% of the flexible fund’s full economic cost. Flexible fund costs should be included in applications as ‘Directly Incurred: Other subheading’. The flexible fund is ring-fenced and funding allocated to the flexible pot cannot be vired for any other use.

The flexible fund should be used to support innovative projects and activities undertaken by researchers outside of the core consortium team. Flexible funds can be allocated to researchers at any organisation currently eligible for UKRI funding . Exceptionally the consortium may fund certain project co-leads at 100% FEC where their involvement in the project complies with UKRI funding policy.

See the UKRI International PcL policy and Business, Third Sector and Government Body PcL Policy . These exceptional costs must be met from within the flexible pot funding awarded. You must define and justify your objectives for the flexible fund and outline how it will be operationalised and governed.

You should carefully consider how any externally distributed funding will be commissioned through a robust peer review process. You should also explain how funding decisions will be made fairly and transparently in line with UKRI principles of assessment and decision making . It is expected that the UKRI Safer Streets team will participate in the design of opportunities offered via the flexible fund and the selection of projects.

It is the project lead’s responsibility to ensure ongoing governance and correct usage and accountability of the funds. At the application stage, we would expect to see some examples of the types of projects and activities funded via the flexible fund. The research and innovation challenges are expected to evolve throughout the lifetime of the consortium and should be co-created and collaborative in nature.

The funded projects are expected to engage with the wider programme of activity and report their progress and outcomes to the consortium. These outcomes should be reported as part of the wider consortium programme reporting. UKRI should be consulted throughout the award to ensure good practice is followed in the assessment and allocation of flexible funds.

associated studentships are not eligible for inclusion conventional large scale surveys and public opinion polls research that makes a purely theoretical or methodological contribution to academic debates projects that are not primarily focused on trust and confidence in UK policing Supporting skills and talent We encourage you to follow the principles of the Concordat to Support the Career Development of Researchers and the Technician Commitment .

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) UKRI is committed in ensuring that effective international collaboration in research and innovation takes place with integrity and within strong ethical frameworks.

Trusted Research and Innovation (TR&I) is a UKRI work programme designed to help protect all those working in our thriving and collaborative international sector by enabling partnerships to be as open as possible, and as secure as necessary. Our TR&I Principles set out UKRI’s expectations of organisations funded by UKRI in relation to due diligence for international collaboration.

As such, applicants for UKRI funding may be asked to demonstrate how their proposed projects will comply with our approach and expectation towards TR&I, identifying potential risks and the relevant controls you will put in place to help proportionately reduce these risks. See further guidance and information about TR&I , including where applicants can find additional support.

We are running this funding opportunity on the new UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Funding Service so please ensure that your organisation is registered. You cannot apply on the Joint Electronic Submissions (Je-S) system. The project lead is responsible for completing the application process on the Funding Service, but we expect all team members and project partners to contribute to the application.

Only the lead research organisation can submit an application to UKRI. Select ‘Start application’ near the beginning of this Funding finder page. Confirm you are the project lead.

Answer questions directly in the text boxes. You can save your answers and come back to complete them or work offline and return to copy and paste your answers. If we need you to upload a document, follow the upload instructions in the Funding Service.

All questions and assessment criteria are listed in the How to apply section on this Funding finder page. Allow enough time to check your application in ‘read-only’ view before sending to your research office. Send the completed application to your research office for checking.

They will return it to you if it needs editing. Your research office will submit the completed and checked application to UKRI. Please be aware that research office and finance teams undertake checks on hosting arrangements and financial eligibility.

The ultimate responsibility for ensuring compliance with all opportunity requirements lies with the applicant. Where indicated, you can also demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.

When including images, you must: provide a descriptive caption or legend for each image immediately underneath it in the text box (this must be outside the image and counts towards your word limit) insert each new image on a new line use files smaller than 5MB and in JPEG, JPG, JPE, JFI, JIF, JFIF, PNG, GIF, BMP or WEBP format Images should only be used to convey important visual information that cannot easily be put into words.

The following are not permitted, and your application will be rejected if you include: sentences or paragraphs of text excessive quantities of images A few words are permitted where the image would lack clarity without the contextual words, such as a diagram, where text labels are required for an axis or graph column.

For more guidance on the Funding Service, see: how applicants use the Funding Service how research offices use the Funding Service how reviewers use the Funding Service References should be included within the word count of the appropriate question section. You should use your discretion when including references and prioritise those most pertinent to the application. Hyperlinks can be used in reference information.

When including references, you should consider how your references will be viewed and used by the assessors, ensuring that: references are easily identifiable by the assessors references are formatted as appropriate to your research persistent identifiers are used where possible General use of hyperlinks Applications should be self-contained. You should only use hyperlinks to link directly to reference information.

You must not include links to web resources to extend your application. Assessors are not required to access links to conduct assessment or recommend a funding decision. Generative artificial intelligence (AI) Use of generative AI tools to prepare funding applications is permitted, however, caution should be applied.

For more information see our policy on the use of generative AI in application and assessment . UKRI must receive your application by 27 October 2026 at 4:00pm UK time. You will not be able to apply after this time.

Make sure you are aware of and follow any internal institutional deadlines. Following the submission of your application to this funding opportunity, your application cannot be changed, and submitted applications will not be amended. If your application does not follow the guidance, it may be rejected.

UKRI will need to collect some personal information to manage your Funding Service account and the registration of your funding applications. We will handle personal data in line with UK data protection legislation and manage it securely. For more information, including how to exercise your rights, read our privacy notice .

If you or a core team member need to tell us something you wish to remain confidential, email SaferStreetsChallengeThree@ukri. org Include in the subject line: [the funding opportunity title; sensitive information; your Funding Service application number].

Typical examples of confidential information include: individual is unavailable until a certain date (for example due to parental leave) additional information about eligibility to apply that would not be appropriately shared in the ‘Applicant and team capability’ section conflict of interest for UKRI to consider in reviewer or panel participant selection the application is an invited resubmission For information about how UKRI handles personal data, read UKRI’s privacy notice .

Institutional matched funding There is no requirement for matched funding from the institutions hosting the project lead, project co-leads or other staff employed on the application, beyond the standard 20% FEC. Expert reviewers and panels assessing UKRI funding applications must not consider levels of institutional matched funding as a factor on which to base recommendations.

Direct and in-kind contributions from third party project partners are encouraged. This policy does not remove the need for support from host organisations who must provide the necessary research environment and infrastructure for award-specific activities funded by UKRI. For example, research facilities, training and development of staff.

UKRI will publish the outcomes of this funding opportunity at What AHRC has funded . If your application is successful, we will publish some personal information on the UKRI Gateway to Research . In plain English, provide a summary we can use to identify the most suitable experts to assess your application.

We usually make this summary publicly available on external-facing websites, therefore do not include any confidential or sensitive information.

Make it suitable for a variety of readers, for example: the wider research community Guidance for writing a summary Clearly describe your proposed work in terms of: the challenge the project addresses potential applications and benefits List the key members of your team and assign them roles from the following: project co-lead (UK) (PcL) project co-lead (international) (PcL (I)) professional enabling staff research and innovation associate Only list one individual as project lead.

Exceptionally the consortium may fund certain project co-leads at 100% FEC where their involvement in the project complies with UKRI funding policy. See the UKRI International PcL policy and Business, Third Sector and Government Body PcL Policy . These exceptional costs must be met from within the flexible pot funding awarded.

UKRI has introduced a new addition to the ‘Specialist’ role type. Public contributors such as people with lived experience can now be added to an application. Find out more about UKRI’s core team roles in funding applications .

What are you hoping to achieve with your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response Explain how your proposed work: is of excellent quality and importance within or beyond the field(s) or area(s) has the potential to advance current understanding, generates new knowledge, thinking or discovery within or beyond the field or area is timely given current trends, context and needs impacts world-leading research, society, the economy or the environment addresses the potential challenges encountered by the consortium in this research area, including members who are from under-represented groups will embed EDI considerations into the programme, and outline how these will guide your aims and activities References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Within the Vision section we also expect you to: if applicable, demonstrate the alignment of the application to the funding opportunity objectives clearly state the research and innovation challenges that you will address explain how you will embed environmental sustainability within your activities How are you going to deliver your proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response Explain how you have designed your approach so that it: is effective and appropriate to achieve your objectives is feasible, and comprehensively identifies any risks to delivery and how they will be managed if applicable, uses a clearly written and transparent methodology if applicable, summarises the previous work and describes how this will be built upon and progressed will maximise translation of outputs into outcomes and impacts describes how your, and if applicable your team’s, research environment (in terms of where the research is undertaken and relevance to the project) will contribute to the success of the work explain how you will undertake community and stakeholder engagement and wider participation will build EDI considerations into the formation, operation and governance of the consortium, including how these will be operationalised outlines future plans for funding and sustaining the partnerships, tools and approaches beyond this application References may be included within this section.

You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant. Further details are provided in the Funding Service.

Within the Approach section we also expect you to: evidence co-creation and user engagement provide a detailed and comprehensive project plan including milestones and timelines explain how the consortium will be planned and managed, and how it will enable stakeholders to work together to collectively deliver innovative co-designed solutions The consortium must bring together academics (including those with research, lived experience or both, within relevant communities), police, community safety and justice leads, policymakers, third sector organisations and community groups, and relevant industry partners, to co-produce innovative, practical and inclusive measures of confidence and trust in policing.

Children under the age of 18 and victims of violence against women and girls must be prioritised by the consortium. Other underrepresented groups, prioritised with local forces, may also be included. You will need to detail and justify their selection and inclusion.

You should show how you plan on engaging with the police and other key organisations to design, test and implement a series of pilots. You must include a co-design plan demonstrating how police and members of the target underrepresented communities have been, or will be, involved in designing the tools or approaches before deployment.

Co-design must be genuine and documented, and your application must describe the specific decisions that co-design will inform. How will you manage the award to successfully deliver its objectives?

What the assessors are looking for in your response Explain how the proposed award will be managed, demonstrating that it: will be effectively governed, including details about advisory structures will be effectively and inclusively managed, demonstrated by a clear management plan has clear leadership team roles and responsibilities will manage and encourage partnerships with non-HEI organisations across government, industry and civil society has plans for monitoring your progress as well as self-evaluation throughout the lifetime of your award has equality, diversity and inclusion embedded in plans for convening and engaging with their community and the allocation of the awarded funds You may demonstrate elements of your responses in visual form if relevant.

Further details are provided in the Funding Service. Applicant and team capability to deliver Why are you the right individual or team to successfully deliver the proposed work?

What the assessors are looking for in your response Evidence of how you, and if relevant your team, have: the relevant experience (appropriate to career stage) to deliver the proposed work the right balance of skills and expertise to cover the proposed work the appropriate leadership and management skills to deliver the work and your approach to develop others contributed to developing a positive research environment and wider community The word limit for this section is 1,650 words, 1,150 words to be used for Résumé for Research and Innovation (R4RI) modules and, if necessary, a further 500 words for Additions.

Use the R4RI format to showcase the range of relevant skills you, and if relevant your team (project lead and project co-leads, researchers, technicians, specialists, partners and so on) have and how this will help to deliver the proposed work. You can include individuals’ specific achievements but only choose past contributions that best evidence their ability to deliver this work.

Complete this section using the R4RI module headings listed below. Use each heading once and include a response for the whole team, see the UKRI guidance on R4RI .

You should consider how to balance your answer, and emphasise where appropriate the key skills each team member brings: contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge the development of others and maintenance of effective working relationships contributions to the wider research and innovation community contributions to broader research or innovation users and audiences and towards wider societal benefit Provide any further details relevant to your application.

This section is optional and can be up to 500 words. You should not use it to describe additional skills, experiences or outputs, but you can use it to describe any factors that provide context for the rest of your R4RI (for example, details of career breaks if you wish to disclose them). You should complete this section as a narrative.

Do not format it like a CV. The roles in funding applications policy has descriptions of the different project roles. Ethics and responsible research and innovation (RRI) What are the ethical and RRI considerations, implications and issues relating to the proposed work?

If you do not think that the proposed work raises any ethical or RRI issues, explain why.

What the assessors are looking for in your response Demonstrate that you have identified and evaluated: the relevant ethical and RRI considerations, including both the research or topic area itself and the design and delivery of the project the wider implications of the proposed work, and how you will maximise the positive societal, environmental, and