University of Delaware Research Foundation (UDRF) Grants

University of Delaware Research Foundation (UDRF) Grants is sponsored by University of Delaware Research Foundation. UDRF supports fundamental research in all science fields, aiming to improve research competitiveness for future external funding.

PREPARING FOR A POTENTIAL FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN GUR UDRF UDRF-SI SEED GRANTS UD seed grant funds are available to support research, scholarship and creative activities through annual university-wide competitions. These are merit-based grants designed to help launch an idea leading to future external sponsorship of research in the area.

Several of the seed grant mechanisms are administered by the Research Office on an annual basis but there are one-time opportunities as well. Additional seed grant mechanisms at UD, which are independently organized and run by other units on campus, are listed under Seed Grant Resources.

For more information contact Research Development Office UD Research Foundation Strategic Initiatives Letter of Intent Deadline: General University Research Grants Letter of Intent Deadline: Letter of Intent Deadline: Campus seed grant opportunities abound at UD, from pilot programs to call for proposals, these opportunities are operated by other units on campus and are waiting to be discovered.

Visit the links below for deadlines and application requirements.

Delaware Center for Musculoskeletal Research Call for Pilot Research Proposals Delaware EPSCoR SPARC-DE Core Facility and Seed Funding Program Delaware INBRE Pilot Project Award NIH NIGMS Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) on Discovery of Chemical Probes and Therapeutic Leads Budget Category Worksheet GUR Final Report Template Internal Seed Grant Request for “Rebudgeting” or “No Cost Extension” Limited Submission White Paper Template Proposal Review Panel Interest Form UDRF Final Report Template UDRF-SI Final Report Template Community Force Application GUR and UDRF Email: Subject-No Cost Extension Internal Grant Opportunities FAQs (GUR, UDRF and UDRF-SI) 1.

What is the project period? GUR Awards are effective from April 1 to March 31 (two-year period) UDRF Awards are effective from April 1 to March 31 (two-year period) UDRF- SI Awards are effective from February 1 to January 31 (two year period) 2. What is a no-cost extension?

The university expects recipients to complete all requirements of the internal award by the termination date listed in the award letter. The Research Office will provide additional time by approving your request for a "no-cost extension." 3.

How do I apply for a no-cost extension? Submit a request to The Research Development Office via email at researchdev@udel. edu .

Please copy your assigned Contract & Grant Specialist and Department Administrator in the email. 4. What information will I need to include in my no-cost request?

Please provide the following information: Relevant information that identifies your project: title, purpose (expense code) and the current project termination date The extended termination date (month/day/year) you are requesting. Note: the maximum time allowed is one year Justification -- reasons you need an extension. See guidelines below for help 5.

What justification for no-cost extensions (reasons) is the Research Office likely to accept?

Here are some examples of justifications which would be acceptable: Additional time to assure completion of the original approved project scope and objectives, e.g., to conduct additional testing to validate unexpected research findings to repeat tests to obtain results lost in a campus building fire to conduct the research in a foreign country currently experiencing unrest or a foreign country rebounding from a natural catastrophe (e.g. tsunami, earthquake) Lack of success in locating a graduate student with suitable capabilities Extensive delay in production or shipment of key equipment or supply items Transfer of a key project participant Time lost due to illness, pregnancy or accident of a key project participant 6.

Under what conditions is the Research Office likely to deny a request? Here are examples for which an extension request may be denied: Requests made merely for the purpose of using remaining funds Requests received after the termination date Requests that do not include a justification 7. Am I allowed to purchase an item not included in my original proposal?

The university expects recipients to complete all requirements of the internal award and understands that over the life of the project some reallocation of funding may need to occur. Budget changes exceeding 10% prior to 2018 -- or 25% effective 2018 -- of the total award and rebudgeting of funds into categories not in the original budget (e.g., equipment, foreign travel) are subject to prior approval by the RO. 8.

How do I request a budget reallocation? Requests for rebudgeting must be submitted on the Request for Rebudgeting form via email to researchdev@udel. edu.

Please copy your assigned Contract & Grant Specialist and Department Administrator in the email. 9. What information will I need to include in my reallocation request?

Please complete the rebudgeting form. This form can be found on the research web site at Form, Policies and Procedures. 10.

How do I get my expenses (including salary) paid? Please see your Department Administrator . 11.

Questions about Internal Grant Opportunities? Please contact The Research Development Office, Research Development Manager, Research Office. General University Research Program (GUR) The goal of the General University Research (GUR) award program is to provide full-time UD faculty with seed funding towards research, scholarship, and innovative projects that will accelerate progress toward future extramural sponsorship.

The program is open to all professorial ranks; however, preference is given to early career faculty. Proposals involving interdisciplinary research, scholarship, or innovative projects are especially encouraged. These merit-based grants are administered by the Vice President for Research, Scholarship, and Innovation (VPRSI), who is advised by the Faculty Senate Research Committee (FSRC).

The FSRC evaluates applications and recommends proposals for funding; the VPRSI makes the final award decisions. The FSRC consists of the VPRSI (or a Research Office designee) and eight faculty members, one of whom serves as chair. GUR Key Award Information November 16, 2026, 5:00 p.

m. ET Only applicants who submit an LOI may submit a full proposal December 17, 2026, 5:00 p. m.

ET Up to $15,000 for full project period All full-time faculty members are eligible and encouraged to apply for GUR grants. Preference will be given to faculty who have not received awards previously; however, there is no restriction on the number of awards an individual may receive. Applicants who received a GUR grant starting between June 1, 2024 and June 1, 2026 are ineligible to submit this cycle.

Review of proposals from prior GUR awardees will include consideration of performance on their past GUR award(s). Applicants who failed to complete previous GUR final reports will not be considered for a GUR award. Each proposal will be reviewed by one FSRC member and one or two UD faculty disciplinary experts.

Given the diversity in backgrounds of GUR reviewers, applicants must prepare applications that are understandable by a broad audience. Proposals failing to follow submission guidelines may be returned without review. Last year, the program had a 22% funding rate.

Reviewers will score each proposal on the 1–9 scale described in the GUR Proposal Review Rubric, where 1 is exceptional and 9 is poor (lower scores indicate stronger proposals). Each of the merit criteria gets its own score, in whole numbers. Reviewers begin each criterion at 5 ( Good: strong, with at least one moderate weakness) and move up or down based on the number and severity of weaknesses identified.

Each score should be supported by specific strengths and weaknesses noted in the written critique. The final score is a weighted average of the criterion scores, using the weights shown in parentheses, reported to one decimal place. Significance of the Problem (15%): Does the scholarship clearly address an unmet need of high importance, or is the scholarship extraordinarily novel or a creative innovation?

Intellectual Merit of Approach/Adequacy of the Plan for Scholarship (20%): Are the research plans and methods well developed, and are the activities clearly defined? Is there high alignment of the proposed activities with the identified significance of the problem? Student Involvement (10%): Does the plan for scholarship include actionable steps for student involvement?

Is a well-developed training plan included? PI Qualifications (10%): Is the proposed research aligned with the PI’s background, training, and/or previous work? Is it clear how the proposed research will advance the PI’s professional career?

Justification of Resources (15%): Is the budget well defined and justified based on the allowable budget items and research plan? Is the timeline clear and reasonable? Information on other resources (outside of the GUR funds) leveraged in support of the proposed research is welcome.

Likelihood of Future Sponsorship (20%): Does the proposal clearly articulate future resource streams that could sustain the effort beyond the grant period? PI Professional Rank (10%): Assigned by the Research Office, not by reviewers: Tenure-Track Assistant Professor (1); Tenure-Track Associate Professor (3); Tenure-Track Full Professor (5). GUR proposals may request up to $15,000 in direct costs.

Fringe benefits on PI summer salary may not be charged to GUR funds. Proposals without sufficiently detailed budgets or budget justifications may be returned without review. Matching funds from the PI’s department or college are not required but may be included.

All proposals must include a letter of support from the PI’s direct supervisor confirming support for the PI’s effort on the project and for any matching funds. Personnel : PI faculty summer salary is allowable up to $5,000 or 1/9th salary, whichever is less. Graduate and undergraduate research assistants (RAs) are encouraged and may be paid hourly or by stipend.

Faculty academic-year effort and RA stipends may be included as matching funds and must be confirmed in the supervisor’s letter of support. Fringe Benefits : Fringe benefit costs are required for all personnel categories other than PI summer salary. Direct Research Expenses : Expense categories such as equipment, participant support costs, and other direct research costs are permitted.

Domestic travel for proposed scholarship may be supported if it is well justified within the scope of the project. Unallowable Expenses : Facilities and administrative (F&A) costs, fringe benefits on PI summer salary, graduate tuition, and international travel may not be charged to GUR awards. If a graduate RA receives a stipend from the award, the budget justification must explain how required tuition will be covered.

One-page Budget Justification is required. The committee will consider a wide range of budget requests when items are well justified and may award a different amount than requested. See the GUR Proposal Template .

Prepare the proposal budget knowing that Research Office approval is required before moving more than 25% of the total award between budget categories or moving funds into a category not in the approved budget. Unapproved charges will be moved to the PI’s departmental account, and the award may be terminated with remaining funds returned to the Research Office. See the GUR Post-Award section for more information.

NOTE: For tax purposes, stipends for principal investigators on GUR grants are fellowships rather than wages and are therefore exempt from FICA, but no fellowship is exempt from Federal and State payroll taxes. It is assumed that a faculty member receiving fellowship funds will not have any qualified educational expenses, and appropriate payroll taxes will be subject to withholding at the time of disbursement .

GUR grants are awarded for up to two years with periods of performance commencing June 1. No-cost extensions may be granted up to two times only when circumstances warrant. No-cost extension instructions are in the GUR Post-Award section.

PROPOSAL COMPONENTS & FORMATTING Submit the GUR proposal using the GUR Proposal Template . All components should be single-spaced using 11-pt Arial font with one-inch margins. A.

Executive Summary (one page): The executive summary has three parts: Overview: The scope of the proposed activity. Significance of the problem: how the scholarship addresses an unmet need of high importance or is an extraordinarily novel or creative innovation. Intellectual Merit of the approach/plan: a concise summary of the plan, methods and activities and how they align with the significance of the problem.

B. Project Description (three pages): The Project Description should fully describe the plan for scholarship, with clear, achievable goals, and the significance of the problem. Please write for a reviewer with advanced training in an allied discipline who may not be an expert in your field.

Figures and tables may be included. The Project Description must also address: Student involvement: the roles the student(s) will play and the research training opportunities the project will provide, appropriate to the project’s scope. PI qualifications and career development: how the work builds on the PI’s background and will strengthen the PI’s competitiveness for future extramural funding and other opportunities.

Resources: how GUR funds and any other resources will be used strategically to support the work. Future sponsorship: a clear plan for seeking extramural funding, naming the specific federal agencies, foundations, or other sponsors the PI will target and the timeline for submission. C.

Timeline (one-half page): A narrative, chart, or infographic showing a clear, reasonable timeline for the proposed activities, with dates, tasks, milestones, and dependencies as applicable. D. References (two pages maximum) E.

Budget Justification (one page maximum) F. Biographical Sketch for the PI and any Co-PIs, using the federal Common Form generated in SciENcv G. Current and Pending (Other) Support for the PI and any Co-PIs, using the federal Common Form generated in SciENcv (NSF or NIH version) H.

Letter of Support from the PI’s direct supervisor Combine the preceding documents (A-H) with the completed proposal template and submit them as a single PDF. Incomplete applications will be returned without review. Letter of Intent (LOI) : to submit a full proposal a LOI must be submitted by the deadline noted above using this online application form.

Letters of Intent include: the PI&rsquo;s full name, department affiliation, and email address; a proposed title; and a short (<250 word) abstract of the proposed work. Only PIs who submit a LOI may submit a full proposal. Full Proposal Instructions: PIs who submit a LOI will receive instructions for submitting a full proposal.

Proposal Format: Use the GUR Proposal Template and submit the complete proposal as a single PDF; include all components listed in the Proposal Components section above. Deadline : Submit full proposals through the online application system by 5:00 PM on the deadline above. When notified of an award, contact your post-award grants analyst to start a record in PeopleSoft, UD&rsquo;s grants management system.

Give the analyst a single PDF of the full proposal as submitted. Work with the analyst to prepare the detailed budget required for PeopleSoft entry, using the detailed budget template on the Research Office website. If the award amount differs from the request, this budget serves as the revised budget required under Post-Award Administration.

Guidance on entering GUR awards in PeopleSoft is available in the Research Office&rsquo;s Grants Management Guide . For questions, contact your department&rsquo;s assigned Contract and Grant Analyst.

Sponsor ID: 0921 – General University Research Purpose: RSCH7 – University Sponsored Research Requested amount up to $15,000 entered as direct costs Applicable cost-share entered from department and/or College (not required) Faculty Summer Salary: Up to $5,000 for the Principal Investigator budgeted under account code 120800 and budget category PSTDOC so that fringe benefits are not incurred. Graduate student tuition is prohibited.

F&A Pricing Setup: F&A costs are not permissible on GUR awards. Choose &ldquo;Industrial Research On-Campus&rdquo; for the rate type; overwrite the F&A rate to zero.

Pricing Method should be FIXED Under the Attachments tab, upload a single PDF copy of the full proposal submission using the following naming convention: ProposalID_Other Routing of FIN Proposal Approval Summary (PAS) webform should include PI, Department Chair, College Dean and OSP per standard procedures.

FACULTY S-CONTRACT PROCEDURES If the PI chooses to receive a stipend from their recently awarded grant, the S-Contract that is processed by their department should identify the payment by using account code 120800 and the earnings code PFF. This account code will identify the stipend as a fellowship, which is not subject to FICA taxes, TIAA pension contributions, or university matching of such contributions.

In addition, the account will not be charged fringe benefits on the stipend. The comments section of the S-Contract should include the phrase “Stipend Award from GUR”. University policy limits a summer payment such as this to $5,000 or 1/9th of the PI's regular salary, whichever is less.

Reviewers score each of the merit criteria on a 1–9 scale, where 1 is exceptional and 9 is poor (lower scores are stronger). Every criterion starts at 5 ( Good: strong, but with at least one moderate weakness).

Reviewers then move the score up or down based on the number and seriousness of the weaknesses they find: Exceptional to excellent; no more than minor weaknesses Very good to satisfactory; minor to moderate weaknesses (5 is the starting point) Fair to poor; one or more major weaknesses A minor weakness is easily addressed, a moderate weakness lessens impact, and a major weakness severely limits impact.

A proposal earns a score better than 5 only when reviewers find few or no weaknesses. Reviewers must justify each score in their written critique. GUR Proposal Rubric Matrix GUR grants are made with the following understood commitments from the PI.

Employment : Accepting the award signifies the PI&rsquo;s intent to remain employed at the University for the duration of the award period.

Regulatory approvals: Research involving human subjects or private identifiable data must be approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) , research involving vertebrate animals by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) , and research involving recombinant DNA or biohazardous materials by the Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC), before any GUR funds are spent.

If a required approval is not granted, the award will be withdrawn. Reviewer Service: Award recipients are expected to serve as reviewers in future GUR competitions. Objectives and Final Report: The University does not direct the details of the research but requires adherence to the project&rsquo;s original objectives.

A final report is due to the Research Office within 90 days of the award end date, submitted through the UD Internal Seed Grant Request form . Acknowledgement: Publications and other scholarly works directly resulting from a GUR grant must include an acknowledgment that the research was carried out with the support of the University of Delaware General University Research grant program.

Each grantee is required to furnish one copy of any resulting papers, books, or other publications to the University Library through the Research Office ( researchdev@udel. edu ). Fiscal management.

Manage award funds according to the approved budget and University financial policies, and spend them by the award end date, including any approved no-cost extension. Obtain Research Office approval before moving more than 25% of the total award between budget categories or moving funds into a category not in the approved budget.

Unapproved charges will be moved to the PI&rsquo;s departmental account, and the award may be terminated with remaining funds returned to the Research Office. Funds not spent by the award end date revert to the Research Office. General University Research awards are based on eligibility and merit.

Proposals are reviewed for eligibility by the Research Office and evaluations of merit and award recommendations are made by the Faculty Senate Research Committee. The Vice President for Research, Scholarship, and Innovation makes the final award decision. Each funded proposal will be assigned an award number and a purpose code for expenditures.

After the award is made, the PI&rsquo;s post-award grants analyst enters it into PeopleSoft for tracking and reporting (see the Appendix for instructions). Include the award number and purpose code in all correspondence and reports. If an award is funded at a different amount than requested, the PI must submit a revised budget before the purpose code is established.

Use the UD Internal Seed Grant Request form to request rebudgeting or a no-cost extension and to submit the final report. Rebudgeting: Obtain Research Office approval before moving more than 25% of the total award between budget categories or moving funds into a category not in the approved budget.

Unapproved charges will be moved to the PI&rsquo;s departmental account, and the award may be terminated with remaining funds returned to the Research Office. Submit rebudgeting requests through the UD Internal Seed Grant Request form . No-cost Extensions: Submit NCE requests between 90 and 30 days before the award end date.

Each request must state the reason for the extension and its length. Each extension may be up to one year, with no more than two extensions per award. Final Reports: A final report is due to the Research Office within 90 days after the award end date.

Durell Callier — Blackqueer Past, Present, Futures: An Arts-Based Oral History Project, ARTS & SCIENCES Blazo Kovacevic — LEGO Immigration Series: Building Bias and the Evidence of Vulnerability and Brutality, ARTS & SCIENCES Jocelyn Alcántara-García — Instrumental Analysis of Legal Spanish Illuminated Manuscripts at the Fitzwilliam Museum and the Morgan Library and Museum, ARTS & SCIENCES Meghan McInnis-Dominguez — Reciprocal Intelligence: AI and the Humanities, ARTS & SCIENCES Kasia Hitczenko — Modeling early language acquisition, ARTS & SCIENCES Erin Cassese — Struggling Citizens: What Mental Health Professionals Can Teach Us About Political Polarization in America, ARTS & SCIENCES Suzanne Burton — Arts for Life: Delaware, ARTS & SCIENCES Christina Budde — Strengthening Multilingual Learner Instruction through Professional Learning and Coaching: A Pilot Study within a Research–Practice Partnership, EDUCATION & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT Joy Esboldt — Making Sense of Equity: How programs and politics mediate equity learning in teacher preparation, EDUCATION & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT Yendelela Cuffee — Cardiovascular Wellness During the Menopausal Transition: Applying A Convergent Parallel Mixed-Methods Approach to Explore Psychosocial Factors and ASCVD Risk among Black Women, HEALTH SCIENCES Adriana Gorea — 4D KNIT: Innovating Sustainable Textile Design for Next-Generation Fabrications, ARTS & SCIENCES Angela Hattery — Experiences of Gender-Based Violence and Institutional Betrayal Among Indigenous Women in the US, ARTS & SCIENCES Ashley Pigford — Making Self-Expression Accessible with User-Centered Design, ARTS & SCIENCES Jaclyn Schwarz — Brain Networks, Peripheral Factors and Individual Vulnerability to Postpartum Mood Disorder, ARTS & SCIENCES Jarett Haley — An Exploration of Racially Minoritized Undergraduate Students Interactions with Student Affairs Staff Members in U.S. States with Bans on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Programs, EDUCATION & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT Jeffrey Caplan — Elucidating the Role of Extracellular Vesicles in Plant-Fungal Interactions: A Proteomics Approach, AGRICULTURE & NATURAL RESOURCE Jin Yao Kwan — Project STREAM: Strategic and Community-Engaged Teaching, Research and Education across Multimodal Podcast Use, EDUCATION & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT Kisha Porcher — Developing White Preservice Teachers Racial Literacy with Black Clinical Educators, ARTS & SCIENCES Marco Messina — Activity-Based Polymer Amplification Strategies for Mass Spectral-Based Bioimaging of Reactive Oxygen/Nitrogen Species, ARTS & SCIENCES Soo Bin Jang — Understanding Black History Education in Practice: A Multi-Site Case Study of HB-198 Implementation in Delaware Schools, EDUCATION & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT Amber Krauchunas — Sequencing New Sterile Mutants To Identify Genes Important For Fertility.

, ARTS & SCIENCES Brian Kwee — Manufacturing Highly Potent Muscle Progenitor Cells For Tissue Engineered Muscle, ENGINEERING Dilia Lopez-Gydosh — Development Of “The Ftc 1920S Digital Archive, ARTS & SCIENCES Dongxia Liu — Electrochemical Synthesis Of Zeolite Materials, ENGINEERING Jamie Holder — Software Development For A Novel Telescope Array To Study The High-Energy Universe, ARTS & SCIENCES Jeffrey Mugridge — Biochemical And Structural Analysis Of An Uncharacterized Family Of Bacterial Radical Sam Enzymes, ARTS & SCIENCES Jessica Horton — Fire Oppression: Burning And Weaving In Indigenous California, ARTS & SCIENCES Leting Zhang — The Impact Of Health Information Technology On Healthcare Disparity: Evidence From The Inpatient Setting, LERNER COLG OF BUS & ECON Shawna Vican — Contested Terrain: The Law & Diversity Work In Higher Education, ARTS & SCIENCES William Chain — New Marine Natural Products As Non Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Chemotherapeutic Drug Leads, ARTS & SCIENCES Yan Yang — Particle Diffusion And Acceleration In Plasma Turbulence: Efficiencies Of Localized Structures, ARTS & SCIENCES Investigation of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Erlotinib-Resistance Via Raman Microscopy - ARTS & SCIENCES University of Delaware Faculty Jazz Quartet Recording - ARTS & SCIENCES The Planetary Estate: Ecological Improvement and Literary Form, 1791-1859 - ARTS & SCIENCES Effect of Different Corrective Feedback Strategies on Second Language Mandarin Tone and Vocabulary Learning - ARTS & SCIENCES Parent Capacity for Fostering LGBTQ Adolescent Socialization - EDUCATION Development of "The FTC 1920s Digital Archive - ARTS & SCIENCES Can Dietary Choices Improve Childhood Neurodevelopmental Outcomes via Arsenic Methylation?

- HEALTH SCIENCES ANCHORS: Achieving New Course Heights; Opportunities for Research with Students - EARTH, OCEAN & ENVIRONMENT Programmable control of protein activity via formation of biomolecular condensates in bacteria - ENGINEERING Agency and object prominence in linguistic cognition: Investigating sentence processing in Copala-Triqui - ARTS & SCIENCES The Doctor and the Dress – ARTS & SCIENCES Zachary Collier - Addressing Incomplete Data with Artificial Intelligence Francisco Costa - Can market incentives reduce deforestation and promote compliance with environmental law?

Evidence from the Brazilian Amazon Sambeeta Das (Ryan) - Microrobots in Confined Geometries Alexei Kananenka - Using Artificial Intelligence to Optimize Light Harvesting Maik Kecinski - he behavioral impacts of mandates on voluntary contributions to public goods Daniel Lee - Studying the Effects of Moral Violations on Entrepreneurial Decision Making Haritha Malladi - Design and evaluation of instructional coaching strategies to address social loafing on engineering student teams Xi Peng - Adaptive Scientific Machine Learning for Extreme-scale and Ever-evolving Data Analysis Kenneth Shores - Facilities Disruptions and Disruptions to Student Learning: Empirical Evidence from the School District of Philadelphia Evan Usler - Empirical Investigation of A New Theory of Stuttering: The Effects of Motivational Conflict on Speech Anamarie Whitaker - A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Perceptions of Early Care and Education Policy Alignment Within State Early Learning Systems Jennifer Bouek - The Political Economy of Child Care and the Families Within: A Covid Comparison Emerald Christopher - The Manifestations of Jane Crow: Gender-Based Violence and Black Women's Experience Kyle Davis - Global mapping of crop climate resilience Morgan Ellithorpe - Parents' beliefs and intentions toward acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine for their children Ibra Fancher - Assessing the dichotomy of vascular function in obesity: Why are some vascular beds impaired while others are spared?

Lindsay Naylor Jasper - Inclusive climate adaptation in Delaware Zachary Nolan - An Empirical Analysis of Complementarities in Advertising Markets Xiaotao Ran - The Effect of Online Remedial Course on College Readiness Sonia Robles - Revolutionary Platforms: Public Radio and the Emergence of Modern Mexico Kalim Shah - An E-Waste Materials Flow Analysis for Science-Based Regulatory Reform in the U.S. Virgin Islands Lisha Shao - Investigating the neural mechanisms underlying sexual reward in female Drosophila Jiaheng Xie - Understanding Health Misinformation Transmission: An Interpretable Deep Learning Approach to Manage Infodemics Janine de Novais - The Brave Community Workshop Ann Aviles - Housing Status, Health, Well-Being and Violence Christina Barbieri - Targeting Misconceptions to Improve Core Competencies for Students at Risk for Mathematics Difficulties Federica Bianco - Echoes of light detection with artificial intelligence to characterize the history of explosions in our Galaxy Eve Buckley - Hunger Politics during the Early Cold War: Intellectuals from the Global South Contest the Overpopulation Paradigm, 1948-1973 Jonathan Cox - Arrivals: What's left Behind, What Lies Ahead Sarah Curtiss - The Feasibility and Efficacy of Mealtimes on the Spectrum: An Online Toolkit for Making Mealtimes More Meaningful and Functional Sarah DeYoung - UD GUR: Infant feeding in emergencies: measuring changes during natural hazards in the United States Gregory Dobler - Deployment of an Urban Observatory to Monitor Power Distribution and Disruption in Sierra Leone, Africa Colton Lynner - Linking volcanic activity and a large earthquake at the currently erupting Ecuadorian Cotopaxi volcano Teomara Rutherford - Assisting Teachers to Support Positive Student Emotions and Motivation While Using Educational Technology Brooke Stanley - Eating in the Anthropocene: The Global Environmental Novel and the Politics of Food Tyler Van Buren - The interaction of Megakaryocytes and Platelets with Turbulence Malasree Acharya - Mapping the Refugee Net: Border Crossing, Technology and Human Rights in the Mediterranean Noel Archambeault - The Chicana Art Song Project Benjamin Bagozzi - When is Access-to-Information an Effective Accountability Mechanism?

Using Big Data Tools to Study Responsiveness in Mexico and Beyond Sabrin Beg - Strengthening Teacher Ability to Reach all Students Lauren Covington - Identifying Multi-level Determinants of Child Sleep Health in Under-resourced Families Xiang Gao Shalom - Shanghai Martha Hall - Development of Novel Orthopedic Boot Sean Healy - Adaptation, acceptability and feasibility of an automated smart-scale intervention for weight management among young adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities Cresean Hughes - GUR Hughes Pinki Mondal - Analyzing radar satellite data to examine changing rice intensification patterns in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta Chiara Sabina - A holistic community-based intervention for domestic violence in Quito, Ecuador Aaron Terry - Study of responses to local and global politics, media and propaganda in Post-Cold War visual art, media and design to create and inform studies for exhibition, publication and educational opportunities Yi-Lin Tsai - The Politics of Offline Consumer Search for Single Family Homes Jaipreet Virdi Dhesi - Becoming "Hearing-Minded:" Women Researchers and the Politics of Deafness in Interwar Britain Comparing fNIRS-based cortical activation during social cooperation between children with and without ASD Considerations Relating to the Shape of Equilibrium (Reprise) Enhancing Performance for At-Risk Women in STEM Contexts: Retraining Complex & Persistent Stress Responses with Neural Feedback Collecting, Collectivity, and the Making of African American Archives Criminal Visibility: Photographic Culture of Crime and Punishment in the United States, 1839-Present Mapping the Lives of Chronic Pain Sufferers and Access to Disability Assistance The Relationship among Sleep, Executive Function and Diabetes Management in Late Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Psychological and Perceptual Contributions to Biased and Accurate Pain Care Visca L'Amor!

A Reference Audio Recording Documenting the Tenor Voice in Underrepresented Classical Vocal Repertoire by Catalan Composers of the Twentieth and Twenty-First Centuries Humanitarian Exploits: Exploring the Livelihood Strategies of Women in Situations of Displacement Data Analytics Framework for the Smart Asthma Management System with Bluetooth-enabled Personal Inhalers Tara Trammell, Agriculture & Natural Resources - Investigating Urbanization Pressures on Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, and Microbial Community Composition Under Different Tree Species Christopher Nichols, Arts & Sciences - Music: Clarinet Recording Sheng Lu, Arts & SciencesRegional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and Its Impact