1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
YAC Youth Mental Health Grant is sponsored by Jackson Community Foundation (through Youth Advisory Committee - YAC). This grant supports 501(c)3 nonprofits, school districts, churches, and government units dedicated to enhancing mental health resources for youth in Jackson County, Michigan. The focus is on impactful projects that foster a healthier community for young residents.
Get alerted about grants like this
Save a search for “Jackson Community Foundation (through Youth Advisory Committee - YAC)” or related topics and get emailed when new opportunities appear.
Search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: 501(c)3 nonprofits, school districts, churches, and government units serving youth in Jackson County, Michigan. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
YAC Youth Mental Health Grant is funded by Jackson Community Foundation (through Youth Advisory Committee - YAC). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Michigan. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The May 29, 2026 OMB proposed rewrite of 2 CFR 200 is being read primarily as a cost-principles document. The structural change that will reshape how federal grants get decided is proposed §200.205, which requires senior political appointees to conduct a pre-issuance review of all discretionary awards — and the companion provision that makes peer-review recommendations 'advisory only' and not binding on agency decision-makers. The combined effect is the subordination of merit review to political review across NSF, NIH, DOE, USDA, and every other agency that runs peer-reviewed grant competitions. Why this is structurally different from prior administrations' political influence, what the 45-day comment window means for affected institutions, and the strategy for applicants whose proposals will be reviewed under the new framework starting October 1, 2026.
Read articleThe May 29 OMB rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 quietly rebuilds the pass-through entity compliance architecture. Proposed §200.332 strengthens subrecipient risk assessment, monitoring documentation, and remediation triggers. A new requirement mandates that every subaward be reported to SAM.gov with the reported records confirmed in performance reports — converting subaward administration from a back-office accounting function into a public-record certification regime. For the universities, state agencies, and national nonprofits that pass through more than half of their federal awards as subawards, the operational implication is a new compliance operating model that needs to be standing up by the October 1 effective date.
Read articleBuried in the May 29 OMB rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 is the elimination of fixed-amount awards as a default grant instrument. Cost-reimbursement reverts to the standard. Here is what the change costs community-based nonprofits, pass-through subaward portfolios, SBIR Phase II direct-to-award structures, and the grant offices that have built workflows around milestone payments — and the comment-and-renegotiation strategy that has six weeks to land before July 13.
Read article