1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
The link to this grant appears to be broken.
The original source may have moved or been removed. Try searching the funder’s website directly.
Search verified grants from Good Ventures Foundation →This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsApplications reviewed twice a year, in summer and winter. No fixed single deadline — rolling bi-annual review cycle.
The link to this grant appears to be broken.
Living Literature Reviews is sponsored by Good Ventures Foundation. This opportunity supports mission-aligned projects and measurable outcomes.
Get alerted about grants like this
Get emailed when new opportunities from “Good Ventures Foundation” or related funders appear. Free, weekly, unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Living Literature Reviews | Coefficient Giving Write a Living Literature Review with Support from the Abundance and Growth Fund The number of academic papers doubles every 12 years. This wealth of new knowledge is exciting, but the pace of growth makes keeping up with the latest developments increasingly difficult. One response to this challenge is “living literature reviews.
” At the Abundance and Growth Fund, we define a living literature review as a continuously updated online collection of accessible articles that synthesize academic research on a specific topic. These reviews are primarily written by a single expert who is responsible for its quality and accuracy. Living literature reviews aim to be accessible to readers unfamiliar with a field while maintaining rigor.
Unlike news articles that often focus on single, sensational studies, these reviews provide a broader perspective, synthesizing findings from multiple sources. They differ from traditional academic literature reviews by avoiding paywalls, dense jargon, and lengthy formats that pose barriers to non-specialists.
Moreover, because they don’t assume familiarity with the assumptions of a field, living literature reviews aim to describe how conclusions were reached, not just what the conclusions are. This transparency allows readers to better understand the research methodology and form their own judgment on the strength of the findings.
Living literature reviews also help readers assess a field by relying on a single individual to provide a consistent voice, perspective, and expert curatorial taste. While these individuals collaborate with other experts in their fields, having one consistent author allows readers to gauge how much they trust the author’s judgment over time. Finally, living literature reviews leverage digital platforms for hosting and distribution.
Websites allow for post-publication corrections and updates, enabling a level of current relevance that traditional print reviews can’t match. Complementing these, email newsletters and podcasts extend the reach and convenience of learning about academic research. By making research accessible to a broader audience, living literature reviews can facilitate interdisciplinary connections and inform policy work.
They offer insights into work happening in adjacent fields, potentially inspiring collaborations and novel research directions. The Abundance and Growth Fund supports several living literature reviews. Some examples include: Building Abundance by Michael Wiebe.
On housing and infrastructure. Lauren Policy: Migration Literature Review by Lauren Gilbert. On migration, progress, innovation, growth, and development.
The Patentist by Gaétan de Rassenfosse. Providing a clear and non-technical introduction to patent rights, focusing on insights from the economic literature. Existential Crunch by Florian Jehn.
Thoughts about existential risk, history, climate, food security, and societal collapse. The Care Gap by Nalini Gulati and Vikas Dimble. At the intersection of gender and health in low- and middle-income countries.
AI Accountability Review by Nick Diakopoulos. Translates research to help bridge the gap between knowledge and practice for AI policymakers, practitioners, and researchers. The Price of Power by Nikhil Kalyanpur.
How money and influence flow through systems—across democracies and autocracies, in peace and war, from oligarchs to civil society. Monitoring Gene Drives by Felix Moronta Barrios. On Gene Drive Research.
Bridging Boundaries by Rachel George. On Interdisciplinarity. Scaling in Human Societies by Michael Goff.
How and why size matters. New Things Under the Sun by Matt Clancy. Social science research on science and innovation.
Reskilled by James Ransom. Helping people get back to work after their jobs disappear. We also have a live directory of Living Literature Reviews and related projects on our blog.
We are now seeking pre-proposals from individuals to write living literature reviews . We are particularly interested in reviews on neglected topics relevant to policymaking. Ideal candidates will have a Ph.
D. or equivalent expertise in their proposed area. Our support typically allows authors to dedicate a quarter to a third of their time to the project.
If you’re interested in launching your own living literature review, we encourage you to reach out. We review applications twice a year, in the summer and winter. To submit a pre-proposal, please email abundanceandgrowth@coefficientgiving.
org with a brief description of the topic you want to write about and your background. Please also feel free to contact that address for other questions related to this program. Abundance and Growth Fund
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Ideal candidates have a PhD or equivalent expertise in the proposed area; single expert author model focused on neglected topics relevant to policymaking. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
Living Literature Reviews is funded by Good Ventures Foundation. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Yes — this listing is flagged as national in scope, so applicants across the U.S. may apply, subject to the sponsor's other eligibility criteria.
Brown Girl Jane x SheaMoisture Grant is a grant from SheaMoisture and Brown Girl Jane that funds Black and woman-owned beauty and wellness businesses in the United States. Part of SheaMoisture's broader commitment to addressing racial inequality through its $1 million annual giving fund, this program specifically supports founders at the intersection of Black and women-owned entrepreneurship in the beauty and wellness sector. Applicants must be based in the U.S. and have operated their business for at least one year. Grants range from $10,000 to $25,000. Check the SheaMoisture Fund website for the current open cycle, as deadlines vary by cohort.
Support Adoption Grant Program is sponsored by Texas Office of the Attorney General. This program provides critical resources for pregnant women considering adoption and support for children awaiting placement with adoptive parents. Purpose areas include material needs for pregnant women, needs of children awaiting placement, training and advertising related to adoption, and pre- and post-adoption counseling.
The RFI closed June 22. Now the forum is standing up. AI Forge is a jointly governed, university-led venture funding interpretability, control, and adversarial robustness in one-year Project Ventures — here's how the 15 challenges, the CAISI tie, and the nonprofit administrator reshape who gets funded.
Read articleHumanity AI — a collaborative of ten funders including Ford, MacArthur, Mellon, and Mozilla — announced more than $18M to align AI with democratic values. $8M went to 12 invited grantees at $500K each; a $10M open call launches summer 2026. Here is who got funded, what the money signals, and how mission-aligned nonprofits should position for the open round.
Read articleOn June 1, 2026, DARPA and the National Science Foundation jointly released the AI Forge initiative — a university-only forum, administered by a nonprofit launching summer 2026, that will fund Project Ventures of roughly $750,000 to $3 million over one-year terms in three thrust areas: AI interpretability, AI control, and adversarial robustness. The RFI on SAM.gov closes June 22 at 5pm ET and is restricted to U.S. universities and military service academies, one authorized submission per institution. Intellectual property is expected to be shared across forum participants, preferably through open-source licensing. This is the most significant joint DARPA-NSF research vehicle in a decade, and it is structured to bypass the frontier-lab model entirely.
Read article