1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
Local Digitization Grant is sponsored by Tennessee Historical Records Advisory Board (THRAB) / National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC). This grant is for improving the preservation of and access to Tennessee's historical records.
Eligible uses include technology (hardware, software, peripherals) to create online digital collections, training for conservation or digitization, and vendor services for digitization or conservation work. No match requirement.
Get alerted about grants like this
Get emailed when new opportunities from “Tennessee Historical Records Advisory Board (THRAB) / National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC)” or related funders appear. Free, weekly, unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Any government entity or not-for-profit organization that holds permanent, historically valuable archival collections. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $5,000. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
Local Digitization Grant is funded by Tennessee Historical Records Advisory Board (THRAB) / National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
Past winners and funding trends for this program
The May 29, 2026 OMB proposed rewrite of 2 CFR 200 is being read primarily as a cost-principles document. The structural change that will reshape how federal grants get decided is proposed §200.205, which requires senior political appointees to conduct a pre-issuance review of all discretionary awards — and the companion provision that makes peer-review recommendations 'advisory only' and not binding on agency decision-makers. The combined effect is the subordination of merit review to political review across NSF, NIH, DOE, USDA, and every other agency that runs peer-reviewed grant competitions. Why this is structurally different from prior administrations' political influence, what the 45-day comment window means for affected institutions, and the strategy for applicants whose proposals will be reviewed under the new framework starting October 1, 2026.
Read articleThe headlines on OMB's May 29 rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 have focused on §200.205's political pre-issuance review. The structurally larger change is a single sentence in §200.205(d) that says peer review recommendations 'remain advisory and are not ministerially ratified' by the federal agency. That language demotes the peer-review-driven funding model that has defined the NIH, NSF, NEH, and DOE Office of Science research portfolios for fifty years to one input among several — replacing a presumption that scored panels drive funding decisions with a presumption that political appointees do. Comment deadline July 13, effective October 1.
Read articleTennessee's $206.9M RHTP allocation begins distribution with a 30-day virtual maternal/child mental health consultation grant. The state plans a new opportunity every Friday — the cadence and structure here are the blueprint for how the $50B nationwide program rolls out.
Read article