1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
The MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium is an industry-funded research vehicle rather than a conventional grant programme, and the distinction determines who can realistically pursue it.
Member companies pool contributions, MIT researchers propose projects against consortium priorities, and selected projects are funded from that pool - so the applicant pool is principally MIT faculty and their collaborators rather than the open research community.
What makes it worth tracking beyond MIT is the signal it sends about where applied generative AI funding is concentrating: the call focuses squarely on applications of generative AI to business and workforce transformation, meaning deployment, organisational adoption, productivity effects and the reshaping of work, rather than the foundational model research that dominates federal AI funding.
Projects are scoped individually against a pooled budget rather than awarded from a published schedule, which means the proposal conversation is closer to a research partnership negotiation than a competitive grant submission.
The process is two-stage: faculty are asked to submit a Notice of Interest well ahead of the full proposal, with the 2026 cycle setting a Notice of Interest deadline of 10 March 2026, followed by full proposal development with consortium input. That NOI step is not administrative - it is where fit against member company interests is established, and proposals that skip early engagement rarely land.
For companies, the route in is membership rather than application; for researchers outside MIT, the practical opening is collaboration with an MIT PI. The consortium's published priorities and funded project list are the most useful public artefact here, since they map which applied generative AI questions major corporate funders are currently willing to pay for.
Get a weekly digest of new grants like this
A free weekly digest of new foundation and federal funding opportunities as they're added to Granted. Unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →According to the current listing, eligibility includes: The consortium primarily funds MIT faculty and principal investigators, with projects proposed against consortium research priorities and selected for funding from pooled member company contributions. Researchers outside MIT generally participate through collaboration with an MIT principal investigator rather than by applying directly. Companies participate by joining the consortium as members rather than through a proposal process. The call focuses on applications of generative AI to business and workforce transformation, including deployment in organisational settings, productivity and labour effects, adoption pathways and the practical reshaping of work by generative AI systems, rather than foundational model development. The process runs in two stages: faculty are encouraged to submit a Notice of Interest ahead of the full proposal, with the 2026 cycle setting a Notice of Interest deadline of 10 March 2026, followed by full proposal development with consortium input; early engagement is where alignment with member company interests is established. MIT does not publish a fixed per-project award size - projects are individually scoped against the pooled budget and are typically sized to support graduate students and postdoctoral researchers over one to two years. Prospective applicants should consult the consortium's proposals page for current cycle dates, priority areas and budget guidance, and should review the published list of funded projects to assess fit before investing in a submission. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium Call for Proposals on Applied Generative AI for Business and Workforce Transformation is funded by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium, funded by member companies). Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The CU System Sprint Grant is a small, fast-turnaround internal award supporting faculty who want to develop and implement AI-driven pedagogical strategies within a single course. At up to $20,000 with an explicit allowance for one course buyout, it is designed around the real obstacle facing most faculty experimenting with generative AI in teaching - not equipment or data, but protected time. The single-course framing is a deliberate scoping decision and applicants should respect it: proposals aimed at curriculum-wide or program-level transformation are a poor fit, while a concrete plan to redesign one course around AI tools and measure the effect on student learning outcomes matches what the program is asking for. Eligibility extends to tenured and tenure-track faculty as well as full-time and instructional series faculty across all CU campuses, which is broader than many internal research awards and deliberately includes teaching-focused appointments who are often closest to the pedagogical questions at issue. This is the second of three planned cycles, so faculty who miss the October 16, 2026 deadline should expect a third round. For a grants database this entry is narrower in eligibility than a federal or foundation program - it is open only to CU faculty - but it is a useful example of the institutional micro-grant tier that has grown rapidly as universities respond to generative AI in the classroom, and comparable programs now exist at many university systems. Faculty at other institutions who find this relevant should check whether their own provost or academic affairs office runs an equivalent scheme, since these internal AI teaching grants are frequently under-advertised and undersubscribed relative to external competitions.
The MIT Generative AI Impact Consortium (MGAIC) is an MIT-wide initiative bringing together industry partners and MIT faculty to advance generative AI research with high real-world impact. The consortium awards seed grants to MIT-led research teams across priority areas including: multimodal tactile sensing for robotics, real-time collaborative AI agents (e.g., jam_bots for live human-AI musical improvisation), understanding how LLM agents deviate from human choices and decision-making, foundation models for scientific discovery, generative AI for design and engineering, AI for healthcare and biology, and AI-augmented education. Each consortium funding cycle issues call for proposals from MIT faculty, with industry partner alignment guiding priority areas. Industry members include Analog Devices, Coca-Cola, OpenAI, Tata, Cisco, TWG Global, SK Telecom, McKinsey, Citi, and Verizon. Selected projects benefit from industry collaboration, data sharing, compute access through partner companies, and pathway to commercialization or real-world deployment. The consortium is hosted by MIT Schwarzman College of Computing in partnership with MIT Sloan and benefits from cross-MIT participation including CSAIL, Media Lab, and MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab.
On August 26, 2026, NSF named the STC class of 2026: TEMPEST at Michigan State, GENIE at Northwestern, and a human-robot co-adaptation center at UT Austin. $90 million total, $6 million a year each. The 2023 class was four centers and $120 million. The award size is intact; the shelf space shrank 25 percent — and that is the number that should reshape how you plan a center proposal.
Read articleCDC-RFA-EH-27-0074 posted as a forecast September 22, 2026: 6 expected awards at $750,000 to $900,000. That is flat funding against the expiring cycle — and the only proven way in is the consortium model Arizona used to bring three states under one award.
Read articleAt CGI on September 23, 2026, Global Impact Ventures committed $100 million over three years across economic opportunity, health, education, climate resilience and humanitarian needs. There is no application portal. The access route is the intermediary infrastructure — fiscal sponsorship, grantmaking administration, and a 250-organization network.
Read article