1,000+ Opportunities
Find the right grant
Search federal, foundation, and corporate grants with AI — or browse by agency, topic, and state.
This listing may be outdated. Verify details at the official source before applying.
Find similar grantsUSHRAB Grants is sponsored by Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board. Awards grants to cultural heritage organizations, non-profits, and government institutions undertaking time-limited archival projects that preserve and/or provide access to historical records reflecting Utah’s diverse populations and histories.
Get alerted about grants like this
Get emailed when new opportunities from “Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board” or related funders appear. Free, weekly, unsubscribe anytime.
Or search similar grants →Extracted from the official opportunity page/RFP to help you evaluate fit faster.
Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board - The mission of the Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board is to assist public and private non-profit organizations throughout the state in the preservation of and access to records with enduring historical value , and to foster cooperation among cultural heritage institutions and records repositories throughout Utah in carrying out these activities.
Every state and American territory has a State Historical Records Advisory Board (SHRAB). Authorized under the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), SHRABs serve as the central advisory body for historical records planning and for Commission-funded projects developed and carried out within the state.
These boards are coordinating bodies which facilitate cooperation among historical records repositories and other information agencies within the state. SHRABs also serve as a state-level review body for proposals as defined in the Commission’s grant program guidelines. The Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board (USHRAB) was established in 1978.
For details about terms, board seats, and other operations-related information please see the Utah State Boards and Commissions website . Join my email list Submitting form Success! You're on the list.
Whoops! There was an error and we couldn't process your subscription. Please reload the page and try again.
According to the current listing, eligibility includes: Cultural heritage organizations, non-profits, and government institutions in Utah. Confirm the full requirements in the official notice before applying.
The current listing shows up to $7,500. Verify award ceilings, matching requirements, and allowable costs in the official notice.
USHRAB Grants is funded by Utah State Historical Records Advisory Board. Verify program details on the funder's official page before applying.
This opportunity targets applicants in Utah. If your organization operates elsewhere, check the official notice for location requirements.
Start from the official opportunity page linked in this listing — it carries the sponsor's submission instructions.
The May 29, 2026 OMB proposed rewrite of 2 CFR 200 is being read primarily as a cost-principles document. The structural change that will reshape how federal grants get decided is proposed §200.205, which requires senior political appointees to conduct a pre-issuance review of all discretionary awards — and the companion provision that makes peer-review recommendations 'advisory only' and not binding on agency decision-makers. The combined effect is the subordination of merit review to political review across NSF, NIH, DOE, USDA, and every other agency that runs peer-reviewed grant competitions. Why this is structurally different from prior administrations' political influence, what the 45-day comment window means for affected institutions, and the strategy for applicants whose proposals will be reviewed under the new framework starting October 1, 2026.
Read articleThe headlines on OMB's May 29 rewrite of 2 CFR Part 200 have focused on §200.205's political pre-issuance review. The structurally larger change is a single sentence in §200.205(d) that says peer review recommendations 'remain advisory and are not ministerially ratified' by the federal agency. That language demotes the peer-review-driven funding model that has defined the NIH, NSF, NEH, and DOE Office of Science research portfolios for fifty years to one input among several — replacing a presumption that scored panels drive funding decisions with a presumption that political appointees do. Comment deadline July 13, effective October 1.
Read article